31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Good Ideas 329Graham Bell's biography for clues about what he had in mind." O<strong>the</strong>rsare notoriously open to rival interpretations, like paintings and sculpture,which are sometimes designed to have an inscrutable design. Still o<strong>the</strong>rs,like Stonehenge or an assembly of gears found in a shipwreck, probablyhave a function, though we don't know what it is. Artifacts, because <strong>the</strong>ydepend on human intentions, are subject to interpretation and criticismjust as if <strong>the</strong>y were works of art, an activity Dennett calls "artifac<strong>the</strong>rmeneutics."And now we come to <strong>the</strong> mind's way of knowing o<strong>the</strong>r minds. We are allpsychologists. We analyze minds not just to follow soap-opera connivingsbut to understand <strong>the</strong> simplest human actions.The psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen makes <strong>the</strong> point with a story.Mary walked into <strong>the</strong> bedroom, walked around, and walked out. <strong>How</strong> doyou explain it? Maybe you'd say that Mary was looking for something shewanted to find and thought it was in <strong>the</strong> bedroom. Maybe you'd sayMary heard something in <strong>the</strong> bedroom and wanted to know what made<strong>the</strong> noise. Or maybe you'd say that Mary forgot where she was going;maybe she really intended to go downstairs. But you certainly would notsay that Mary just does this every day at this time: she just walks into <strong>the</strong>bedroom, walks around, and walks out again. It would be unnatural toexplain human behavior in <strong>the</strong> physicist's language of time, distance, andmass, and it would also be wrong; if you came back tomorrow to test <strong>the</strong>hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, it would surely fail. Our minds explain o<strong>the</strong>r people's behaviorby <strong>the</strong>ir beliefs and desires because o<strong>the</strong>r people's behavior is in factcaused by <strong>the</strong>ir beliefs and desires. The behaviorists were wrong, andeveryone intuitively knows it.Mental states are invisible and weightless. Philosophers define <strong>the</strong>mas "a relation between a person and a proposition." The relation is an attitudelike believes-that, desires-that, hopes-that, pretends-that. Theproposition is <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong> belief, something very roughly like <strong>the</strong>meaning of a sentence—for example, Mary finds <strong>the</strong> keys, or The keys arein <strong>the</strong> bedroom. The content of a belief lives in a different realm from <strong>the</strong>facts of <strong>the</strong> world. There are unicorns grazing in Cambridge Common isfalse, but John thinks <strong>the</strong>re are unicorns grazing in Cambridge Commoncould very well be true. To ascribe a belief to someone, we can't just

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!