31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

158 HOW THE MIND WORKShas clear -lens&oval eyeballseeswellhas clearlens(AA)has clear —lens &oval eyeballseeswellhas clear —lens &round eyeballsees •better•• reproduces• has clearlens &round eyeballThis molecule or crystal was a product not of natural selection but of <strong>the</strong>laws of physics and chemistry. (If it were a product of selection, wewould have an infinite regress.) Replicators are wont to multiply, and asingle one multiplying unchecked would fill <strong>the</strong> universe with its greatgreat-great-.. .-great-grandcopies. But replicators use up materials tomake <strong>the</strong>ir copies and energy to power <strong>the</strong> replication. The world isfinite, so <strong>the</strong> replicators will compete for its resources. Because no copyingprocess is one hundred percent perfect, errors will crop up, and notall of <strong>the</strong> daughters will be exact duplicates. Most of <strong>the</strong> copying errorswill be changes for <strong>the</strong> worse, causing a less efficient uptake of energyand materials or a slower rate or lower probability of replication. But bydumb luck a few errors will be changes for <strong>the</strong> better, and <strong>the</strong> replicatorsbearing <strong>the</strong>m will proliferate over <strong>the</strong> generations. Their descendantswill accumulate any subsequent errors that are changes for <strong>the</strong> better,including ones that assemble protective covers and supports, manipulators,catalysts for useful chemical reactions, and o<strong>the</strong>r features of whatwe call bodies. The resulting replicator with its apparently well-engineeredbody is what we call an organism.Natural selection is not <strong>the</strong> only process that changes organisms overtime. But it is <strong>the</strong> only process that seemingly designs organismsover time. Dawkins stuck out his neck about extraterrestrial evolutionbecause he reviewed every alternative to selection that has been proposedin <strong>the</strong> history of biology and showed that <strong>the</strong>y are impotent toexplain <strong>the</strong> signature of life, complex design.The folk <strong>the</strong>ory that organisms respond to an urge to unfold intomore complex and adaptive forms obviously won't do. The urge—and, more important, <strong>the</strong> power to achieve its ambitions—is a bit ofmagic that is left unexplained.The two principles that have come to be associated with Darwin'spredecessor Jean Baptiste Lamarck—use and disuse, and <strong>the</strong> inheri-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!