31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ho<strong>the</strong>ads | 381<strong>the</strong> two laws of sympa<strong>the</strong>tic magic—voodoo—found in many traditionalcultures: <strong>the</strong> law of contagion (once in contact, always in contact) and<strong>the</strong> law of similarity (like produces like).Though disgust is universal, <strong>the</strong> list of nondisgusting animals differsfrom culture to culture, and that implies a learning process. As everyparent knows, children younger than two put everything in <strong>the</strong>irmouths, and psychoanalysts have had a field day interpreting <strong>the</strong>ir lackof revulsion for feces. Rozin and his colleagues studied <strong>the</strong> developmentof disgust by offering children various foods that American adultsfind disgusting. To <strong>the</strong> horror of <strong>the</strong>ir onlooking parents, sixty-two percentof toddlers ate imitation dog feces ("realistically crafted frompeanut butter and odorous cheese"), and thirty-one percent ate agrasshopper.Rozin suggests that disgust is learned in <strong>the</strong> middle school-age years,perhaps when children are scolded by <strong>the</strong>ir parents or <strong>the</strong>y see <strong>the</strong> lookon <strong>the</strong>ir parents' faces when <strong>the</strong>y approach a disgusting object. But I findthat unlikely. First, all <strong>the</strong> subjects older than toddlers behaved virtually<strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong> adults did. For example, four-year-olds wouldn't eat imitationfeces or drink juice with a grasshopper in it; <strong>the</strong> only differencebetween <strong>the</strong>m and <strong>the</strong> adults was that <strong>the</strong> children were less sensitive tocontamination by brief contact. (Not until <strong>the</strong> age of eight did <strong>the</strong> childrenreject juice briefly dipped with a grasshopper or with imitation dogfeces.) Second, children above <strong>the</strong> age of two are notoriously finicky, and<strong>the</strong>ir parents struggle to get <strong>the</strong>m to eat new substances, not to avoid oldones. (The anthropologist Elizabeth Cashdan has documented that children'swillingness to try new foods plummets after <strong>the</strong> third birthday.)Third, if children had to learn what to avoid, <strong>the</strong>n all animals would bepalatable except for <strong>the</strong> few that are proscribed. But as Rozin himselfpoints out, all animals are disgusting except for a few that are permitted.No child has to be taught to revile greasy grimy gopher guts or mutilatedmonkey meat.Cashdan has a better idea. The first two years, she proposes, are asensitive period for learning about food. During those years mo<strong>the</strong>rs controlchildren's food intake and children eat whatever <strong>the</strong>y are permitted.Then <strong>the</strong>ir tastes spontaneously shrink, and <strong>the</strong>y stomach only <strong>the</strong> foods<strong>the</strong>y were given during <strong>the</strong> sensitive period. Those distastes can last toadulthood, though adults occasionally overcome <strong>the</strong>m from a variety ofmotives: to dine with o<strong>the</strong>rs, to appear macho or sophisticated, to seekthrills, or to avert starvation when familiar fare is scarce.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!