31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thinking Machines 79The computational <strong>the</strong>ory of mind also rehabilitates once and for all<strong>the</strong> infamous homunculus. A standard objection to <strong>the</strong> idea thatthoughts are internal representations (an objection popular among scientiststrying to show how tough-minded <strong>the</strong>y are) is that a representationwould require a little man in <strong>the</strong> head to look at it, and <strong>the</strong> little mmwould require an even littler man to look at <strong>the</strong> representations insidehim, and so on, ad infinitum. But once more we have <strong>the</strong> spectacle of<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretician insisting to <strong>the</strong> electrical engineer that if <strong>the</strong> engineer iscorrect his workstation must contain hordes of little elves. Talk ofhomunculi is indispensable in computer science. Data structures areread and interpreted and examined and recognized and revised all <strong>the</strong>time, and <strong>the</strong> subroutines that do so are unashamedly called "agents,""demons," "supervisors," "monitors," "interpreters," and "executives."Why doesn't all this homunculus talk lead to an infinite regress? Becausean internal representation is not a lifelike photograph of <strong>the</strong> world, and<strong>the</strong> homunculus that "looks at it" is not a miniaturized copy of <strong>the</strong> entiresystem, requiring its entire intelligence. That indeed would haveexplained nothing. Instead, a representation is a set of symbols correspondingto aspects of <strong>the</strong> world, and each homunculus is required onlyto react in a few circumscribed ways to some of <strong>the</strong> symbols, a feat farsimpler than what <strong>the</strong> system as a whole does. The intelligence of <strong>the</strong>system emerges from <strong>the</strong> activities of <strong>the</strong> not-so-intelligent mechanicaldemons inside it. The point, first made by Jerry Fodor in 1968, has beensuccinctly put by Daniel Dennett:Homunculi are bogeymen only if <strong>the</strong>y duplicate entire <strong>the</strong> talents <strong>the</strong>y arerung in to explain. ... If one can get a team or committee of relativelyignorant, narrow-minded, blind homunculi to produce <strong>the</strong> intelligentbehavior of <strong>the</strong> whole, this is progress. A flow chart is typically <strong>the</strong> organizationalchart of a committee of homunculi (investigators, librarians,accountants, executives); each box specifies a homunculus by prescribinga function without saying how it is accomplished (one says, in effect:put a little man in <strong>the</strong>re to do <strong>the</strong> job). If we <strong>the</strong>n look closer at <strong>the</strong> individualboxes we see that <strong>the</strong> function of each is accomplished by subdividingit via ano<strong>the</strong>r flow chart into still smaller, more stupid homunculi.Eventually this nesting of boxes within boxes lands you with homunculiso stupid (all <strong>the</strong>y have to do is remember whe<strong>the</strong>r to say yes or no whenasked) that <strong>the</strong>y can be, as one says, "replaced by a machine." One dischargesfancy homunculi from one's scheme by organizing armies of idiotsto do <strong>the</strong> work.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!