31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 J HOW THE MIND WORKSeffects. What is special is information processing. We can regard a pieceof natter that carries information about some state of affairs as a symbol;it can "stand for" that stale of affairs. But as a piece of matter, it can doo<strong>the</strong>r things as well—physical things, whatever that kind of matter inthat kind of state can do according to <strong>the</strong> laws of physics and chemistry.Tree rings carry information about age, but <strong>the</strong>y also reflect light andabsorb staining material. Footprints carry information about animalmotions, but <strong>the</strong>y also trap water and cause eddies in <strong>the</strong> wind.Now here is an idea. Suppose one were to build a machine with partsthat are affected by <strong>the</strong> physical properties of some symbol. Some leveror electric eye or tripwire or magnet is set in motion by <strong>the</strong> pigmentabsorbed by a tree ring, or <strong>the</strong> water trapped by a footprint, or <strong>the</strong> lightreflected by a chalk mark, or <strong>the</strong> magnetic charge in a bit of oxide. Andsuppose that <strong>the</strong> machine <strong>the</strong>n causes something to happen in someo<strong>the</strong>r pile of matter. It burns new marks onto a piece of wood, or stampsimpressions into nearby dirt, or charges some o<strong>the</strong>r bit of oxide. Nothingspecial has happened so far; all I have described is a chain of physicalevents accomplished by a pointless contraption.Here is <strong>the</strong> special step. Imagine that we now try to interpret <strong>the</strong>newly arranged piece of matter using <strong>the</strong> scheme according to which <strong>the</strong>original piece carried information. Say we count <strong>the</strong> newly burried woodrings and interpret <strong>the</strong>m as <strong>the</strong> age of some tree at some time, eventhough <strong>the</strong>y were not caused by <strong>the</strong> growth of any tree. And let's say that<strong>the</strong> machine was carefully designed so that <strong>the</strong> interpretation of its newmarkings made sense—that is, so that <strong>the</strong>y carried information aboutsomething in <strong>the</strong> world. For example, imagine a machine that scans <strong>the</strong>rings in a stump, burns one mark on a nearby plank for each ring, movesover to a smaller stump from a tree that was cut down at <strong>the</strong> same time,scans its rings, and sands off one mark in <strong>the</strong> plank for each ring. Whenwe count <strong>the</strong> marks on <strong>the</strong> plank, we have <strong>the</strong> age of <strong>the</strong> first tree at <strong>the</strong>time that <strong>the</strong> second one was planted. We would have a kind of rationalmachine, a machine that produces true conclusions from true premises—not because of any special kind of matter or energy, or because of any partthat was itself intelligent or rational. All we have is a carefully contrivedchain of ordinary physical events, whose first link was a configuration ofmatter that carries information. Our rational machine owes its rationalityto two properties glued toge<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> entity we call a symbol: a symbolcarries information, and it causes things to happen. (Tree rings correlatewith <strong>the</strong> age of <strong>the</strong> tree, and <strong>the</strong>y can absorb <strong>the</strong> light beam of a scanner.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!