31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Family Values 469"optimal," <strong>the</strong>y will be a shorthand for <strong>the</strong> strategies that would have ledto reproductive success in that world. I will not be referring to what ismorally right, attainable in <strong>the</strong> modern world, or conducive to happiness,which are different matters altoge<strong>the</strong>r.The first question of strategy is how many partners to want. Rememberthat when <strong>the</strong> minimum investment in offspring is greater for females, amale can have more offspring if he mates with many females, but afemale does not have more offspring if she mates with many males—oneper conception is enough. Suppose a foraging man with one wife canexpect two to five children with her. A premarital or extramarital liaisonthat conceives a child would increase his reproductive output by twentyto fifty percent. Of course, if <strong>the</strong> child starves or is killed because <strong>the</strong>fa<strong>the</strong>r isn't around, <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r is genetically no better off. The optimalliaison, <strong>the</strong>n, is with a married woman whose husband would bring up<strong>the</strong> child. In foraging societies, fertile women are almost always married,so sex with a woman is usually sex with a married woman. Even if she isnot, more fa<strong>the</strong>rless children live than die, so a liaison with an unmarriedpartner can increase reproduction, too. None of this math applies towomen. A part of <strong>the</strong> male mind, <strong>the</strong>n, should want a variety of sexualpartners for <strong>the</strong> sheer sake of having a variety of sexual partners.Do you think that <strong>the</strong> only difference between men and women isthat men like women and women like men? Any bartender or grandmo<strong>the</strong>ryou ask would say that men are more likely to have a wanderingeye, but perhaps that is just an old-fashioned stereotype. The psychologistDavid Buss has looked for <strong>the</strong> stereotype in <strong>the</strong> people most likely torefute it—men and women in elite liberal American universities a generationafter <strong>the</strong> feminist revolution, in <strong>the</strong> heyday of politically correctsensibilities. The methods are refreshingly direct.Confidential questionnaires asked a series of questions. <strong>How</strong>strongly are you seeking a spouse? The answers were on average identicalfor men and women. <strong>How</strong> strongly are you seeking a one-nightstand? The women said, Not very strongly; <strong>the</strong> men said, Pretty strongly.<strong>How</strong> many sexual partners would you like to have in <strong>the</strong> next month? In<strong>the</strong> next two years? In your lifetime? Women said that in <strong>the</strong> next mon<strong>the</strong>ight-tenths of a sexual partner would be just about right. They wanted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!