31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notes to Pages 112-133 | 571112 Past-tense debate: Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986b; <strong>Pinker</strong> & Prince, 1988, 1994;Prince & <strong>Pinker</strong>, 1988; <strong>Pinker</strong>, 1991; Prasada & <strong>Pinker</strong>, 1993; Marcus, Brinkmann,Clahsen, Wiese, & <strong>Pinker</strong>, 1995.113 Problems with connectoplasm: <strong>Pinker</strong> & Mehler, 1988; <strong>Pinker</strong> & Prince, 1988;Prince & <strong>Pinker</strong>, 1988; Prasada & <strong>Pinker</strong>, 1993; Marcus, 1997a, b, in preparation;Fodor & Pylyshyn, 1988; Fodor & McClaughlin, 1990; Minsky & Papert, 1988b;Lachter & Bever, 1988; Anderson, 1990, 1993; Newell, 1990; Ling & Marinov,1993; Hadley, 1994a, b.113 Hume on contiguity and similarity: Hume, 1748/1955.115 Vanishing cherry: Berkeley, 1713/1929, p. 324.116 Identifying individuals: Bloom, 1996a.117 Loving a twin: L. Wright, 1995.117 Which Blick bit?: Boston Globe, 1990.118 Wildebeests and zebras versus lions and hyenas: Personal communication fromDaniel Dennett.120 Systematicity of thoughts: Fodor & Pylyshyn, 1988.121 Problems with representing propositions: Hinton, 1981.122 Propositions in networks: Hinton, 1981; McClelland & Kawamoto, 1986; Shastri &Ajjanagadde, 1993; Smolensky, 1990, 1995; Pollack, 1990; Hadley & Hayward,1994.123 Amnesic networks: McCloskey & Cohen, 1989; Ratcliff, 1990. Bat-wielding bat:McClelland & Kawamoto, 1986.124 Multiple memories: Sherry and Schacter, 1987. Multiple connectionist memories:McClelland, McNaughton, & O'Reilly, 1995.125 Recursive transition networks for sentence understanding: <strong>Pinker</strong>, 1994, chap. 7.125 Recurrent networks: Jordan, 1989; Elman, 1990; Giles et al., 1990. Failure of recurrentnetworks to handle propositions: Marcus, 1997a, in preparation. Connectionistproposition-crunchers: Pollack, 1990; Berg, 1991; Chalmers, 1990.126 Fuzzy categories: Rosch, 1978; Smith & Medin, 1981. Fuzzy categories in connectoplasm:Whittlesea, 1989; McClelland & Rumelhart, 1985.127 Problems with fuzzy categories: Armstrong, Gleitman, & Gleitman, 1983; Rey,1983; <strong>Pinker</strong> & Prince, 1996; Marcus, 1997b; Medin, 1989; Smith, Langston, &Nisbett, 1992; Keil, 1989.127 Gorillas and onions: Hinton, Rumelhart, & McClelland, 1986, p. 82.128 Ape diets: Glander, 1992.128 Explanation-based generalization: Pazzani, 1987, 1993; Pazzani & Dyer, 1987; Pazzani& Kibler, 1993; de Jong & Mooney, 1986.129 Sorites: Fodor & Pylyshyn, 1988; Poundstone, 1988. Universality of long reasoningchains: Brown, 1991; Boyd & Silk, 1996.130 Connectionist family tree: Rumelhart, Hinton, & Williams, 1986.132 Johnson on mind and matter: Quoted in Minsky, 1985. Huxley on <strong>the</strong> Djin: Quotedin Humphrey, 1992. Water into wine: McGinn, 1989b.133 Consciousness boom: Humphrey, 1992; Dennett, 1991; Crick, 1994; Penrose,1994; Jackendoff, 1987; Searle, 1992, 1995; Marcel & Bisiach, 1988; Baars, 1988.133 Gould on inventing consciousness: Gould, 1993, pp. 294—295.133 Mirror, mirror: Gallup, 1991; Parker, Mitchell, & Boccia, 1994. Mirrors and mon-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!