31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Revenge of <strong>the</strong> Nerds 209genuine <strong>the</strong>ory of cultural evolution. Taken literally, it predicts that culturalevolution works like this. A meme impels its bearer to broadcast it,and it mutates in some recipient: a sound, a word, or a phrase is randomlyaltered. Perhaps, as in Monty Python's Life of Brian, <strong>the</strong> audienceof <strong>the</strong> Sermon on <strong>the</strong> Mount mishears "Blessed are <strong>the</strong> peacemakers" as"Blessed are <strong>the</strong> cheesemakers." The new version is more memorableand comes to predominate in <strong>the</strong> majority of minds. It too is mangled bytypos and speakos and hearos, and <strong>the</strong> most spreadable ones accumulate,gradually transforming <strong>the</strong> sequence of sounds. Eventually <strong>the</strong>yspell out, "That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind."I think you'll agree that this is not how cultural change works. A complexmeme does not arise from <strong>the</strong> retention of copying errors. It arisesbecause some person knuckles down, racks his brain, musters his ingenuity,and composes or writes or paints or invents something. Granted,<strong>the</strong> fabricator is influenced by ideas in <strong>the</strong> air, and may polish draft afterdraft, but nei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong>se progressions is like natural selection. Justcompare <strong>the</strong> input and <strong>the</strong> output—draft five and draft six, or an artist'sinspiration and her oeuvre. They do not differ by a few random substitutions.The value added with each iteration comes from focusing brainpoweron improving <strong>the</strong> product, not from retelling or recopying ithundreds of thousands of times in <strong>the</strong> hope that some of <strong>the</strong> malapropsor typos will be useful.Stop being so literal-minded! respond <strong>the</strong> fans of cultural evolution.Of course cultural evolution is not an exact replica of <strong>the</strong> Darwinian version.In cultural evolution, <strong>the</strong> mutations are directed and <strong>the</strong> acquiredcharacteristics are inherited. Lamarck, while being wrong about biologicalevolution, turned out to be right about cultural evolution.But this won't do. Lamarck, recall, was not just unlucky in his guessabout life on this planet. As far as explaining complex design goes, his<strong>the</strong>ory was, and is, a non-starter. It is mute about <strong>the</strong> beneficent force in<strong>the</strong> universe or all-knowing voice in <strong>the</strong> organism that bestows <strong>the</strong> usefulmutations. And it's that force or voice that's doing all <strong>the</strong> creative work.To say that cultural evolution is Lamarckian is to confess that one has noidea how it works. The striking features of cultural products, namely<strong>the</strong>ir ingenuity, beauty, and truth (analogous to organisms' complex adaptivedesign), come from <strong>the</strong> mental computations that "direct"—that is,invent—<strong>the</strong> "mutations," and that "acquire"—that is, understand—<strong>the</strong>"characteristics."Models of cultural transmission do offer insight on o<strong>the</strong>r features of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!