31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Family Values 491fa<strong>the</strong>rs and bro<strong>the</strong>rs) have controlled women's sexuality. They haveused chaperones, veils, wigs, chadors, segregation by sex, confinement,foot-binding, genital mutilation, and <strong>the</strong> many ingenious designs forchastity belts. Despots not only kept harems but kept <strong>the</strong>m guarded. Intraditional societies, "protecting a woman" was a euphemism for keepingher chaste. (Mae West observed, "Men always say <strong>the</strong>y're protectingyou, but <strong>the</strong>y never say from what.") Only fertile women werecontrolled in <strong>the</strong>se ways; children and postmenopausal women hadmore freedom.The word adultery is related to <strong>the</strong> word adulterate and refers to makinga woman impure by introducing an improper substance. The infamousdouble standard, in which a married woman's philandering ispunished more severely than a married man's, is common in legal andmoral codes in all kinds of societies. Its rationale was succinctly capturedwhen James Boswell remarked, "There is a great differencebetween <strong>the</strong> offence of infidelity in a man and that of his wife," andSamuel Johnson replied, "The difference is boundless. The manimposes no bastards on his wife." Both <strong>the</strong> married woman and herlover are commonly punishable (often by death), but <strong>the</strong> symmetry isillusory, because it is <strong>the</strong> woman's marital status, not <strong>the</strong> man's, thatmakes it a crime, specifically, a crime against her husband. Untilrecently most of <strong>the</strong> world's legal systems treated adultery as a propertyviolation or tort. The husband was entitled to damages, a refund of <strong>the</strong>bride-price, a divorce, or <strong>the</strong> right to violent revenge. Rape was anoffense against <strong>the</strong> woman's husband, not against <strong>the</strong> woman. Elopementwas considered an abduction of a daughter from her fa<strong>the</strong>r. Untilvery recently, <strong>the</strong> rape of a woman by her husband was not a crime, oreven a coherent concept: husbands were entitled to sex with <strong>the</strong>irwives.Throughout <strong>the</strong> English-speaking world, <strong>the</strong> common law recognizesthree circumstances that reduce murder to manslaughter: self-defense,<strong>the</strong> defense of close relatives, and sexual contact with <strong>the</strong> man's wife.(Wilson and Daly observe that <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> three main threats to Darwinianfitness.) In several American states, including Texas as recently as1974, a man who discovered his wife in flagrante delicto and killed herlover was not guilty of a crime. Even today, in many places those homicidesare not prosecuted or <strong>the</strong> killer is treated leniently. Jealous rage at<strong>the</strong> sight of a wife's adultery is cited as one of <strong>the</strong> ways a "reasonableman" can be expected to behave.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!