31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34 J HOW THE MIND WORKSingless, but I think it confuses two issues: what all minds have in common,and how minds can differ. The vapid statements above can bemade intelligible by replacing "<strong>How</strong> X works" with "What makes X workbetter than Y":The usefulness of a computer depends on both <strong>the</strong> power of itsprocessor and <strong>the</strong> expertise of <strong>the</strong> user.The speed of a car depends on <strong>the</strong> engine, <strong>the</strong> fuel, and <strong>the</strong> skill of <strong>the</strong>driver. All are important factors.The quality of sound coming from a CD player depends on two crucialvariables: <strong>the</strong> player's mechanical and electronic design, and <strong>the</strong>quality of <strong>the</strong> original recording. Nei<strong>the</strong>r can be ignored.When we are interested in haw much better one system functionsthan a similar one, it is reasonable to gloss over <strong>the</strong> causal chains insideeach system and tally up <strong>the</strong> factors that make <strong>the</strong> whole thing fast orslow, hi-fi or low-fi. And this ranking of people—to determine who entersmedical school, or who gets <strong>the</strong> job—is where <strong>the</strong> framing of nature versusnurture comes from.But this book is about how <strong>the</strong> mind works, not about why some people'sminds might work a bit better in certain ways than o<strong>the</strong>r people'sminds. The evidence suggests that humans everywhere on <strong>the</strong> planet see,talk, and think about objects and people in <strong>the</strong> same basic way. The differencebetween Einstein and a high school dropout is trivial compared to<strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> high school dropout and <strong>the</strong> best robot in existence,or between <strong>the</strong> high school dropout and a chimpanzee. That is<strong>the</strong> mystery I want to address. Nothing could be far<strong>the</strong>r from my subjecti matter than a comparison between <strong>the</strong> means of overlapping bell curves\ for some crude consumer index like IQ. And for this reason, <strong>the</strong> relativeimportance of innateness and learning is a phony issue.An emphasis on innate design should not, by <strong>the</strong> way, be confusedwith <strong>the</strong> search for "a gene for" this or that mental organ. Think of <strong>the</strong>genes and putative genes that have made <strong>the</strong> headlines: genes for musculardystrophy, Huntington's disease, Alzheimer's, alcoholism, schizophrenia,manic-depressive disorder, obesity, violent outbursts, dyslexia,bed-wetting, and some kinds of retardation. They are disord&rs, all of<strong>the</strong>m. There have been no discoveries of a gene for civility, language,memory, motor control, intelligence, or o<strong>the</strong>r complete mental systems,and <strong>the</strong>re probably won't ever be. The reason was summed up by <strong>the</strong>politician Sam Rayburn: Any jackass can kick down a barn, but it takes a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!