31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

314 HOW THE MIND WORKSCORE CURRICULUMYou have channel-surfed to a rerun of L.A. Law, and you want to knowwhy <strong>the</strong> harpy lawyer Rosalind Shays is weeping on <strong>the</strong> witness stand. Ifsomeone began to explain that <strong>the</strong> fluid in her tear ducts had increasedin volume until <strong>the</strong> pressure exceeded <strong>the</strong> surface tension by such andsuch an amount, you would squelch <strong>the</strong> lecture. What you want to findout is that she hopes to win a lawsuit against her former employers and isshedding crocodile tears to convince <strong>the</strong> jury that when <strong>the</strong> firm firedher she was devastated. But if you saw <strong>the</strong> next episode and wanted toknow why she plummeted to <strong>the</strong> bottom of an elevator shaft after sheaccidentally stepped through <strong>the</strong> open door, her motives would be irrelevantto anyone but a Freudian gone mad. The explanation is that matterin free fall, Rosalind Shays included, accelerates at a rate of 9.8 metersper second per second.There are many ways to explain an event, and some are better than o<strong>the</strong>rs.Even if neuroscientists someday decode <strong>the</strong> entire wiring diagram of<strong>the</strong> brain, human behavior makes <strong>the</strong> most sense when it is explained interms of beliefs and desires, not in terms of volts and grams. Physics providesno insight into <strong>the</strong> machinations of a crafty lawyer, and even fails toenlighten us about many simpler acts of living things. As Richard Dawkinsobserved, "If you throw a dead bird into <strong>the</strong> air it will describe a gracefulparabola, exactly as physics books say it should, <strong>the</strong>n come to rest on <strong>the</strong>ground and stay <strong>the</strong>re. It behaves as a solid body of a particular mass andwind resistance ought to behave. But if you throw a live bird in <strong>the</strong> air itwill not describe a parabola and come to rest on <strong>the</strong> ground. It will flyaway, and may not touch land this side of <strong>the</strong> county boundary." We understandbirds and plants in terms of <strong>the</strong>ir innards. To know why <strong>the</strong>y moveand grow, we cut <strong>the</strong>m open and put bits under a microscope. We need yetano<strong>the</strong>r kind of explanation for artifacts like a chair and a crowbar: a statementof <strong>the</strong> function <strong>the</strong> object is intended to perform. It would be silly totry to understand why chairs have a stable horizontal surface by cutting<strong>the</strong>m open and putting bits of <strong>the</strong>m under a microscope. The explanationis that someone designed <strong>the</strong> chair to hold up a human behind.Many cognitive scientists believe that <strong>the</strong> mind is equipped withinnate intuitive <strong>the</strong>ories or modules for <strong>the</strong> major ways of making sense

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!