31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

306 | HOW THE MIND WORKSstumble upon evidence undermining <strong>the</strong>ir claims to have descended fromheroes and gods. Brown looked at twenty-five civilizations and compared<strong>the</strong> ones organized by hereditary castes with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. None of <strong>the</strong> castesocieties had developed a tradition of writing accurate depictions of <strong>the</strong>past; instead of history <strong>the</strong>y had myth and legend. The caste societieswere also distinguished by an absence of political science, social science,natural science, biography, realistic portraiture, and uniform education.Good science is pedantic, expensive, and subversive. It was anunlikely selection pressure within illiterate foraging bands like our ancestors',and we should expect people's native "scientific" abilities to differfrom <strong>the</strong> genuine article.LITTLE BOXESThe humorist Robert Benchley said that <strong>the</strong>re are two classes of peoplein <strong>the</strong> world: those who divide <strong>the</strong> people of <strong>the</strong> world into two classes,and those who do not. In Chapter 2, when I asked why <strong>the</strong> mind keepstrack of individuals, I took it for granted that <strong>the</strong> mind forms categories.But <strong>the</strong> habit of categorizing deserves scrutiny as well. People put thingsand o<strong>the</strong>r people into mental boxes, give each box a name, and <strong>the</strong>reaftertreat <strong>the</strong> contents of a box <strong>the</strong> same. But if our fellow humans are asunique as <strong>the</strong>ir fingerprints and no two snowflakes are alike, why <strong>the</strong>urge to classify?Psychology textbooks typically give two explanations, nei<strong>the</strong>r of whichmakes sense. One is that memory cannot hold all <strong>the</strong> events that bombardour senses; by storing only <strong>the</strong>ir categories, we cut down on <strong>the</strong>load. But <strong>the</strong> brain, with its trillion synapses, hardly seems short of storagespace. It's reasonable to say that entities cannot fit in memory when<strong>the</strong> entities are combinatorial—English sentences, chess games, allshapes in all colors and sizes at all locations—because <strong>the</strong> numbers fromcombinatorial explosions can exceed <strong>the</strong> number of particles in <strong>the</strong> universeand overwhelm even <strong>the</strong> most generous reckoning of <strong>the</strong> brain'scapacity. But people live for a paltry two billion seconds, and <strong>the</strong>re is noknown reason why <strong>the</strong> brain could not record every object and event weexperience if it had to. Also, we often remember both a category and itsmembers, such as months, family members, continents, and baseballteams, so <strong>the</strong> category adds to <strong>the</strong> memory load.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!