31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

42 HOW THE MIND WORKSFirst, selection operates over thousands of generations. For ninetyninepercent of human existence, people lived as foragers j in smallnomadic bands. Our brains are adapted to that long-vanished way of life,not to brand-new agricultural and industrial civilizations. They are notwired to cope with anonymous crowds, schooling, written language, government,police, courts, armies, modern medicine, formal social institutions,high technology, and o<strong>the</strong>r newcomers to <strong>the</strong> human experience.Since <strong>the</strong> modern mind is adapted to <strong>the</strong> Stone Age, not <strong>the</strong> computerage, <strong>the</strong>re is no need to strain for adaptive explanations for everything wedo. Our ancestral environment lacked <strong>the</strong> institutions that now enticeus to nonadaptive choices, such as religious orders, adoption agencies,and pharmaceutical companies, so until very recently <strong>the</strong>re was nevera selection pressure to resist <strong>the</strong> enticements. Had <strong>the</strong> Pleistocenesavanna contained trees bearing birth-control pills, we might haveevolved to find <strong>the</strong>m as terrifying as a venomous spider.Second, natural selection is not a puppetmaster that pulls <strong>the</strong> stringsof behavior directly. It acts by designing <strong>the</strong> generator of behavior: <strong>the</strong>package of information-processing and goal-pursuing mechanisms called<strong>the</strong> mind. Our minds are designed to generate behavior that would havebeen adaptive, on average, in our ancestral environment, but any particulardeed done today is <strong>the</strong> effect of dozens of causes. Behavior is <strong>the</strong> outcomeof an internal struggle among many mental modules, and it isplayed out on <strong>the</strong> chessboard of opportunities and constraints defined byo<strong>the</strong>r people's behavior. A recent cover story in Time asked, "Adultery: IsIt in Our Genes?" The question makes no sense because nei<strong>the</strong>r adulterynor any o<strong>the</strong>r behavior can be in our genes. Conceivably a desire for adulterycan be an indirect product of our genes, but <strong>the</strong> desire may be overriddenby o<strong>the</strong>r desires that are also indirect products of our genes, suchas <strong>the</strong> desire to have a trusting spouse. And <strong>the</strong> desire, even if it prevailsin <strong>the</strong> rough-and-tumble of <strong>the</strong> mind, cannot be consummated as overtbehavior unless <strong>the</strong>re is a partner around in whom that desire has alsoprevailed. Behavior itself did not evolve; what evolved was <strong>the</strong> mind.Reverse-engineering is possible only when one has a hint of what <strong>the</strong>device was designed to accomplish. We do not understand <strong>the</strong>olive-pitteruntil we catch on that it was designed as a machine for pitting olives

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!