31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

234 I HOW THE MIND WORKSDavid Marr noted that built-in assumptions about <strong>the</strong> world weevolved in can come to <strong>the</strong> rescue. Among <strong>the</strong> n 2 possible matches of npoints, not all are likely to have come from this goodly frame, <strong>the</strong> earth.A well-engineered matcher should consider only <strong>the</strong> matchups that arephysically likely.First, every mark in <strong>the</strong> world is anchored to one position on one surfaceat one time. So a legitimate match must pair up identical points in<strong>the</strong> two eyes that came from a single splotch in <strong>the</strong> world. A black dot inone eye should match a black dot in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, not a white dot, because<strong>the</strong> matchup has to represent a single position on some surface, and thatposition cannot be a black splotch and a white splotch at <strong>the</strong> same time.Conversely, if a black dot does match a black dot, <strong>the</strong>y must come from asingle position on some surface in <strong>the</strong> world. (That is <strong>the</strong> assumptionviolated by autostereograms: each of <strong>the</strong>ir splotches appears in severalpositions.)Second, a dot in one eye should be matched with no more than onedot in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. That means that a line of sight from one eye is assumedto end at a splotch on one and only one surface in <strong>the</strong> world. At firstglance it looks as if <strong>the</strong> assumption rules out a line of sight passingthrough a transparent surface to an opaque one, like <strong>the</strong> bottom of ashallow lake. But <strong>the</strong> assumption is more subtle; it only rules out <strong>the</strong>coincidence in which two identical splotches, one on <strong>the</strong> lake's surfaceand one on <strong>the</strong> bottom, line up one behind <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r from <strong>the</strong> left eye'svantage point while both being visible from <strong>the</strong> right eye's.Third, matter is cohesive and smooth. Most of <strong>the</strong> time a line of sightwill end up on a surface in <strong>the</strong> world that is not drastically closer or far<strong>the</strong>rthan <strong>the</strong> surface hit by <strong>the</strong> neighboring line of sight. That is, neighboringpatches of <strong>the</strong> world tend to lie on <strong>the</strong> same smooth surface. Ofcourse, at <strong>the</strong> boundary of an object <strong>the</strong> assumption is violated: <strong>the</strong> edgeof <strong>the</strong> back cover of this book is a couple of feet away from you, but ifyou glance just to its right you might be looking at <strong>the</strong> moon a quarter ofa million miles away. But boundaries make up a small portion of <strong>the</strong>visual field (you need much less ink to sketch a line drawing than tocolor it in), and <strong>the</strong>se exceptions can be tolerated. What <strong>the</strong> assumptionrules out is a world made up of dust storms, swarms of gnats, fine wires,deep crevasses between craggy peaks, beds of nails viewed point-on, andso on.The assumptions sound reasonable in <strong>the</strong> abstract, but somethingstill has to find <strong>the</strong> matches that satisfy <strong>the</strong>m. Chicken-and-egg prob-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!