31.07.2015 Views

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

Steven Pinker -- How the Mind Works - Hampshire High Italian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thinking Machines 141menter asks <strong>the</strong> person to find a letter that is both green and an O, and<strong>the</strong> letter sits somewhere in a mixed sea of green X's and red O's, <strong>the</strong> personmust consciously search <strong>the</strong> display, letter by letter, checking eachone to see if it meets <strong>the</strong> two-part criterion. The task becomes like <strong>the</strong>children's comic strip Where's Waldo?, in which <strong>the</strong> hero in <strong>the</strong> red-andwhite-stripedjersey hides in a throng of people -wearing red, white, orstripes.What exactly is happening? Imagine that <strong>the</strong> visual field is sprinkledwith thousands of little processors, each of which detects a color or asimple shape like a curve, an angle, or a line whenever it appears at <strong>the</strong>processor's location. The output of one set of processors looks like this:red red red red green red red red, and so on. The output of ano<strong>the</strong>r setlooks like this: straight straight straight curved straight straight straight,and so on. Superimposed on <strong>the</strong>se processors is a layer of odd-man-outdetectors. Each stands astride a group of line or color detectors and"marks" any spot on <strong>the</strong> visual field that differs from its neighbors incolor or in contour. The green surrounded by reds acquires a little extraflag. All it takes to see a green among reds is to spot <strong>the</strong> flag, a taskwithin <strong>the</strong> powers of even <strong>the</strong> simplest demon. An O among X's can bedetected in <strong>the</strong> same way. But <strong>the</strong> thousands of processors tiled across<strong>the</strong> field are too stupid to calculate conjunctions of features: a patch thatis green and curved, or red and straight. The conjunctions are detectedonly by a programmable logic machine that looks at one part of <strong>the</strong> visualfield at a time through a narrow, movable window, and passes on itsanswer to <strong>the</strong> rest of cognition.Why is visual computation divided into an unconscious parallel stageand a conscious serial stage? Conjunctions are combinatorial. It wouldbe impossible to sprinkle conjunction detectors at every location in <strong>the</strong>visual field because <strong>the</strong>re are too many kinds of conjunctions. There area million visual locations, so <strong>the</strong> number of processors needed would bea million multiplied by <strong>the</strong> number of logically possible conjunctions: <strong>the</strong>number of colors we can discriminate times <strong>the</strong> number of contourstimes <strong>the</strong> number of depths times <strong>the</strong> number of directions of motiontimes <strong>the</strong> number of velocities, and so on, an astronomical number. Parallel,unconscious computation stops after it labels each location with acolor, contour, depth, and motion; <strong>the</strong> combinations <strong>the</strong>n have to becomputed, consciously, at one location at a time.The <strong>the</strong>ory makes a surprising prediction. If <strong>the</strong> conscious processoris focused at one location, <strong>the</strong> features at o<strong>the</strong>r locations should float

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!