07.04.2013 Views

m*- w - Clpdigital.org

m*- w - Clpdigital.org

m*- w - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CUT OUT BY THE "MOVIE" CENSOR 19<br />

Rhoda Lewis, points out<br />

that a child would interfere<br />

with their ambitions. Gray<br />

consults Dr. Brainard, his<br />

old family physician. The<br />

latter earnestly urges the<br />

parents to let nature take its<br />

course. He shows that no<br />

worldly achievement can<br />

equal that of parenthood.<br />

"But the physician's advice<br />

is not heeded. Sorrow<br />

and wretchedness follow,<br />

to be terminated by the<br />

husband's waking, for the<br />

latter half of the story had<br />

been only a dream.<br />

"The Pennsylvania censors<br />

objected to this photoplay because<br />

it had reference to prospective motherhood,<br />

which is, as I have already<br />

stated, something apparently abhorrent<br />

to those behind Pennsylvania's<br />

censorship laws.<br />

"Then the censors suggested this little<br />

joke—that the theme of the last three<br />

reels be changed from the discussion of<br />

parenthood to that of child labor in factories<br />

or mines.<br />

"Am I not right," asked the producer,<br />

"when I say that censorship as it works<br />

Great Snakes!<br />

They won't let you look at 'em in Okio or Pennsylvania.<br />

Verboten!<br />

Little boys may be seen—but not at the throttle of a locomotive in Ohio.<br />

out too frequently is a negative rather<br />

than a positive moral force?"<br />

Well, there are the two points of view<br />

—that of the censor and that of the<br />

producer. The former professes to be<br />

broad-minded, fair, and acting only<br />

under the law; the latter to be the victim<br />

of absurd, badgering and conflicting<br />

decisions.<br />

But even the producer quoted above<br />

has not shown the worst side of censorship.<br />

There is a tendency—especially in<br />

the smaller cities and towns—to go a step<br />

farther. Faddists and self-constituted<br />

reformers here get a chance to harass the<br />

industry. Theory and whim want to<br />

have their way without reference to rule<br />

or regulation.<br />

Only a little while ago a dozen members<br />

of a woman's club in a town in Iowa<br />

called upon the local censor. They had<br />

a grievance against a production then<br />

running. A bride was shown seated at<br />

breakfast in a superbly furnished home.<br />

Inasmuch as the husband in the storywas<br />

"only on a salary," these twelve<br />

women thought it a dangerous situation<br />

to set before the young women of the<br />

town! They might be tempted to lead<br />

their husbands (when they got them)<br />

into home expenditures beyond their<br />

means:<br />

There is no exaggeration here. The<br />

{Continued on page 138)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!