28.01.2014 Views

AMMONIUM SULFATE CAS N°: 7783-20-2

AMMONIUM SULFATE CAS N°: 7783-20-2

AMMONIUM SULFATE CAS N°: 7783-20-2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OECD SIDS<br />

<strong>AMMONIUM</strong> <strong>SULFATE</strong><br />

4. ECOTOXICITY ID: <strong>7783</strong>-<strong>20</strong>-2<br />

DATE: 18.04.<strong>20</strong>06<br />

determined.<br />

Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions<br />

Concentrations not measured. Limited documentation of<br />

results.<br />

11-MAY-<strong>20</strong>03 (96)<br />

4.6.3 Toxicity to Soil Dwelling Organisms<br />

Type:<br />

Species:<br />

Endpoint:<br />

Method:<br />

GLP:<br />

Test substance:<br />

other: field<br />

other: Collembola<br />

other: number of collembola<br />

other: see Test Condition<br />

no data<br />

other TS: ammonium sulfate, 150 kg N/ha/a<br />

Remark:<br />

This test simulates ammonium sulfate deposition by acid<br />

rain. Fertiliser application levels could be higher.<br />

Result:<br />

In the first year evaluation, a significant increase of the<br />

numbers of Cryptostigmata in the organic layer to more than<br />

double of control level was detected. In the second year, the<br />

abundances of Cryptostigmata were still high, but the<br />

differences to control were not significant.<br />

As the concentrations applied were in excess of those<br />

delivered by acid rain, it was concluded that acid rain<br />

would not have a detrimental effect on soil collembola.<br />

Test condition: Simulated rainfall delivered 150 kg N ha -1 a -1 (708 kg<br />

(NH4)2SO4 ha -1 a -1) in monthly increments to a field<br />

planted with Picea abies at 2500 ha-1, with no ground<br />

vegetation. The trees were approximately 14 m high at the<br />

time of the experiment, and the canopy covered approx. 90%<br />

of the test area. The salt was dissolved in 1 l of water,<br />

and sprayed on 6m2 plots in a randomised block design. The<br />

soil pH of both experimental and control plots was 5.3 at<br />

the end of the test. The soil fauna were extracted and<br />

counted twice, at the end of year 1 and at the end of year<br />

2.<br />

Reliability: (2) valid with restrictions<br />

concentration not measured. Only one concentration studied<br />

Flag:<br />

Critical study for SIDS endpoint<br />

22-JUL-<strong>20</strong>04 (97)<br />

Type:<br />

Species:<br />

Endpoint:<br />

Method:<br />

GLP:<br />

Test substance:<br />

Remark:<br />

132<br />

other: field<br />

other: Cryptostigmata (family Acarina)<br />

other: number of cryptostigmata<br />

other: see Test Condition<br />

no data<br />

other TS: ammonium sulfate, 150 kg N/ha/a<br />

This test simulates ammonium sulfate deposition by acid<br />

rain. Fertilizer application levels could be higher. Similar<br />

results were also found for other Acari, i.e. Prostigmata<br />

and Astigmata (mineral layer only) at the end of year 1, and<br />

Astigmata in both layers at the end of year 2. However,<br />

Mesostigmata numbers did not differ significantly from<br />

control in either year. No significant decrease was found in<br />

UNEP PUBLICATIONS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!