12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198 HISTORICAL AND DOCUMENTARY <strong>RESEARCH</strong><br />

Life histories<br />

Thomas and Znaniecki’s monumental study, The<br />

Polish Peasant in Europe and America (1918), serves<br />

as an appropriate introduction to this section, for<br />

their detailed account of the life and times of<br />

Wladek Wisniewski is commonly held to be the<br />

first sociological life history.<br />

The life history, according to Plummer (1983),<br />

is frequently a full-length bo<strong>ok</strong> about one person’s<br />

life in his or her own words. Often, Plummer<br />

observes, it is gathered over a number of years,<br />

the researcher providing gentle guidance to the<br />

subject, encouraging him or her either to write<br />

down episodes of life or to tape-record them.<br />

And often as not, these materials will be backed<br />

up with intensive observations of the subject’s<br />

life, with interviews of the subject’s friends and<br />

acquaintances and with close scrutiny of relevant<br />

documents such as letters, diaries and photographs.<br />

Essentially, the life history is an ‘interactive<br />

and co-operative technique directly involving the<br />

researcher’ (Plummer 1983).<br />

Accounts of the perspectives and interpretations<br />

of people in a variety of educational<br />

settings are both significant and pertinent, 4 for<br />

they provide valuable ‘insights into the ways in<br />

which educational personnel come to terms with<br />

the constraints and conditions in which they<br />

work’ (Goodson 1983). Life histories, Goodson<br />

argues, ‘have the potential to make a far-reaching<br />

contribution to the problem of understanding the<br />

links between ‘‘personal troubles’’ and ‘‘public<br />

issues’’, a task that lies at the very heart of the sociological<br />

enterprise’. Their importance, he asserts,<br />

‘is best confirmed by the fact that teachers continually,<br />

most often unsolicited, import life history data<br />

into their accounts of classroom events’ (Goodson<br />

1983).<br />

Miller (1999) demonstrates that biographical<br />

research is a distinctive way of conceptualizing<br />

social activity. He provides outlines of the three<br />

main approaches to analysis, that is to say:<br />

<br />

<br />

the realist, focusing upon grounded-theory<br />

techniques<br />

the neo-positivist, employingmorestructured<br />

interviews<br />

<br />

the narrative, using the interplay between<br />

interviewer and interviewee to actively<br />

construct life histories.<br />

Denzin (1999) suggests that there are several<br />

varieties of biographical research methods<br />

including:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

biography<br />

autobiography<br />

story<br />

discourse<br />

narrative writing<br />

personal history<br />

oral history<br />

case history<br />

life history<br />

personal experience<br />

case study.<br />

This is addressed further by Connelly and<br />

Clandinin (1999) who indicate several approaches<br />

to narrative inquiry:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

oral history<br />

stories<br />

annals and chronicles<br />

photographs<br />

memory boxes<br />

interviews<br />

journals<br />

autobiography<br />

letters<br />

conversations<br />

documents.<br />

In exploring the appropriateness of life history<br />

techniques to a particular research project, and<br />

with ever-present constraints of time, facilities<br />

and finance in mind, it is useful to distinguish life<br />

histories both by type and mode of presentation,<br />

both factors bearing directly upon the scope and<br />

feasibility of the research endeavour. Box 8.2 draws<br />

on an outline by Hitchcock and Hughes (1989).<br />

Readers may wish to refer to the descriptions<br />

of types and modes of presentation contained<br />

in Box 8.2 in assessing the differing demands<br />

that are made on intending researchers as they<br />

gather, analyse and present their data. Whether

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!