12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TABULATING DATA 465<br />

Box 22.4<br />

Student-related factors<br />

Q11: Student-related factors<br />

1-3: P1<br />

4-6: P6<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Students were shy and were afraid of losing face when they made mistakes in front of the class.<br />

Students basically had no interest in learning anything, especially a foreign language.<br />

Students had too many subjects to learn, andlearningEnglishwastoobo<strong>ok</strong>ish.<br />

There were too many other distractions such as surfing the Internet or going out with friends.<br />

Chapter 22<br />

7: F3 Students could not relate learning English to other thingstheylearnedatschool,sotheyhadno<br />

interest.<br />

Students’ language learning ability was poor and they feared learning English.<br />

Students were allowed to repeat programmes, so they could become lazy and indifferent.<br />

8: F3 Students spent too much time surfing the Internet.<br />

Students put more time into science rather than language subjects.<br />

9: F3 Students’ foundation was weak.<br />

10-12: F5 Students lacked enthusiasm and ‘proper’learningattitudes.<br />

Students had poor time management.<br />

Students were afraid of losing face when they made mistakes in front of the class. They were shy as<br />

well.<br />

Students had no direction in their learning and they had no plan for their future. Therefore, they did<br />

not learn well, especially a foreign language.<br />

Students had many opportunities to enter universities, despite having a low standard of English.<br />

in their learning and had limited incentive to learn<br />

English well, as universities required only a low<br />

standard of English.<br />

Comment: there was a great variety of comments<br />

here. There were degrees of agreement: the<br />

teachers of the younger primary children agreed<br />

with each other; the teachers of the older primary<br />

children agreed with each other; and the teachers<br />

of the older secondary children agreed with each<br />

other. The teachers of the younger secondary<br />

children raised different points from each other.<br />

However, the four groups of teachers (younger<br />

primary, older primary, younger secondary and<br />

older secondary) raised different points from each<br />

other.<br />

For an example of the layout of tabulated<br />

word-based data and supporting analysis see the<br />

accompanying web site (http://www.routledge.<br />

com/textbo<strong>ok</strong>s/9780415368780 – Chapter 22, file<br />

22.1.doc).<br />

Summary of the interview data<br />

The issues that emerge from the interview data<br />

are striking in several ways. What characterizes<br />

the data is the widespread agreement of the<br />

respondents on the issues. For example:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

There was absolute unanimity in the responses<br />

to questions 9, 12.<br />

There was very considerable, though not<br />

absolute, unanimity on question 11.<br />

In addition to the unanimity already observed,<br />

there was additional unanimity among the<br />

primary teachers in respect of question 11.<br />

In addition to the considerable, though not<br />

absolute, unanimity already observed, there<br />

was much unanimity among the primary<br />

teachers concerning question 6.<br />

Such a degree of unanimity gives considerable<br />

power to the results, even though, because<br />

of the sampling used, they cannot be said

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!