12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QUESTIONNAIRES CONTAINING FEW VERBAL ITEMS 337<br />

questionnaire. For this reason it is important<br />

to commence the questionnaire with nonthreatening<br />

questions that respondents can readily<br />

answer. After that it might be possible to move<br />

towards more personalized questions.<br />

Completing a questionnaire can be seen as a<br />

learning process in which respondents become<br />

more at home with the task as they proceed.<br />

Initial questions should therefore be simple, have<br />

high interest value, and encourage participation.<br />

This will build up the confidence and motivation<br />

of the respondent. The middle section of<br />

the questionnaire should contain the difficult<br />

questions; the last few questions should be of<br />

high interest in order to encourage respondents to<br />

return the completed schedule.<br />

Acommonsequenceofaquestionnaireisas<br />

follows:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Commence with unthreatening factual questions<br />

(that, perhaps, will give the researcher<br />

some nominal data about the sample, e.g. age<br />

group, sex, occupation, years in post, qualifications<br />

etc.).<br />

Move to closed questions (e.g. dichotomous,<br />

multiple choice, rating scales, constant sum<br />

questions) about given statements or questions,<br />

eliciting responses that require opinions,<br />

attitudes, perceptions, views.<br />

Then move to more open-ended questions (or,<br />

maybe, to intersperse these with more closed<br />

questions) that seek responses on opinions,<br />

attitudes, perceptions and views, together<br />

with reasons for the responses given. These<br />

responses and reasons might include sensitive<br />

or more personal data.<br />

The move is from objective facts to subjective<br />

attitudes and opinions through justifications and<br />

to sensitive, personalized data. Clearly the ordering<br />

is neither as discrete nor as straightforward as this.<br />

For example, an apparently innocuous question<br />

about age might be offensive to some respondents,<br />

aquestionaboutincomeisunlikelytogodownwell<br />

with somebody who has just become unemployed,<br />

and a question about religious belief might be seen<br />

as an unwarranted intrusion into private matters.<br />

Indeed, many questionnaires keep questions about<br />

personal details until the very end.<br />

The issue here is that the questionnaire designer<br />

has to anticipate the sensitivity of the topics in<br />

terms of the respondents, and this has a large<br />

sociocultural dimension. What is being argued<br />

here is that the logical ordering of a questionnaire<br />

has to be mediated by its psychological ordering.<br />

The instrument has to be viewed through the eyes<br />

of the respondent as well as the designer.<br />

In addition to the overall sequencing of<br />

the questionnaire, Oppenheim (1992: ch. 7)<br />

suggests that the sequence within sections of the<br />

questionnaire is important. He indicates that the<br />

questionnaire designer can use funnels and filters<br />

within the question. A funnelling process moves<br />

from the general to the specific, asking questions<br />

about the general context or issues and then<br />

moving toward specific points within that. A filter<br />

is used to include and exclude certain respondents,<br />

i.e. to decide if certain questions are relevant or<br />

irrelevant to them, and to instruct respondents<br />

about how to proceed (e.g. which items to jump<br />

to or proceed to). For example, if respondents<br />

indicate a ‘yes; or a ‘no’ to a certain question,<br />

then this might exempt them from certain other<br />

questions in that section or subsequently.<br />

Questionnaires containing few verbal<br />

items<br />

The discussion so far has assumed that<br />

questionnaires are entirely word-based. This<br />

might be off-putting for many respondents,<br />

particularly children. In these circumstances a<br />

questionnaire might include visual information<br />

and ask participants to respond to this (e.g.<br />

pictures, cartoons, diagrams) or might include<br />

some projective visual techniques (e.g. to draw<br />

apictureordiagram,tojointworelatedpictures<br />

with a line, to write the words or what someone<br />

is saying or thinking in a ‘bubble’ picture), to tell<br />

the story of a sequence of pictures together with<br />

personal reactions to it. The issue here is that in<br />

tailoring the format of the questionnaire to the<br />

characteristics of the sample, a very wide embrace<br />

might be necessary to take in non-word-based<br />

Chapter 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!