12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

500 CONTENT ANALYSIS AND GROUNDED THEORY<br />

frequently merge. This raises the issues of validity<br />

and reliability. What we have here is a problem of<br />

the ‘double hermeneutic’ – as researchers we are<br />

members of the world that we are researching,<br />

so we cannot be neutral; we live in an alreadyinterpreted<br />

world. More extensively Morrison<br />

(2003) suggests that the problem extends beyond<br />

this. Lo<strong>ok</strong> at the example above:<br />

The teacher and the children act on the basis<br />

of their interpretations of the situation (their<br />

‘definitions of the situation’).<br />

The lived actions are converted from one<br />

medium (observations, actions and live events)<br />

to another (written) by choosing to opt only<br />

for transcription – an interpretation of their<br />

interpretation.<br />

The researcher then interprets the written<br />

data (a third hermeneutic) and writes<br />

an unavoidably selective account (a fourth –<br />

quadruple – hermeneutic – an interpretation<br />

of an interpretation of an interpretation of<br />

an interpretation!).<br />

The reader then brings his/her own<br />

biography and background to interpret<br />

the researcher’s written interpretation (a<br />

fifth – quintuple – hermeneutic).<br />

Given the successive interpretations it is difficult<br />

not to suggest that reliability and validity can<br />

easily be compromised in qualitative research.<br />

Reflexivity as the disclosure of one’s possible<br />

biased interpretations does little to reduce them – I<br />

can state my possible biases and interpretations<br />

but that does not necessarily stop them from<br />

being selective and biased. This suggests, perhaps,<br />

the limits of reflexivity. In connection with<br />

increasing reliability and validity, reflexivity is<br />

not enough.<br />

The accompanying web site contains an<br />

introductory manual for using QSR NUD.IST (the<br />

principles of which apply to N-Vivo: see http://<br />

www.routledge.com/textbo<strong>ok</strong>s/9780415368780 –<br />

Chapter 23, file 23.2 doc). The web site<br />

also contains a full set of Word-based<br />

data files specifically prepared for QSR, concerning<br />

a single project of assessment and<br />

testing (see http://www.routledge.com/textbo<strong>ok</strong>s/<br />

9780415368780 – Chapter 23, files qsr23.13<br />

through to qsr23.23). These have also been<br />

saved into Word documents (see http://www.<br />

routledge.com/textbo<strong>ok</strong>s/9780415368780 –<br />

Chapter 23, file 23.3.doc through to file<br />

23.13.doc). A listing of the documents of<br />

qualitative data that are prepared is available<br />

on the accompanying web site (http://<br />

www.routledge.com/textbo<strong>ok</strong>s/9780415368780 –<br />

Chapter 23, file QSR FILES ON THE WEB<br />

SITE).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!