12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

594 NOTES<br />

Society (2005). Comparable developments may be<br />

found in other fields of endeavour. For an examination<br />

of key ethical issues in medicine, business,<br />

and journalism together with reviews of common<br />

ethical themes across these areas, see Serafini, A.<br />

(ed.) (1989) Ethics and Social Concern. NewYork:<br />

Paragon House. The bo<strong>ok</strong> also contains an account<br />

of principal ethical theories from Socrates to<br />

R. M. Hare.<br />

2 US Dept of Health, Education and Welfare,Public<br />

Health Service and National Institute of Health<br />

(1971) The Institutional Guide to D.H.E.W. Policy<br />

on Protecting Human Subjects. DHEWPublication<br />

(NIH): 2 December, 72–102.<br />

3 As regards judging researchers’ behaviour, perhaps<br />

the only area of educational research where the<br />

term ethical absolute can be unequivocally applied<br />

and where subsequent judgement is unquestionable<br />

is that concerning researchers’ relationship with<br />

their data. Should they choose to abuse their data<br />

for whatever reason, the behaviour is categorically<br />

wrong; no place here for moral relativism. For<br />

once a clear dichotomy is relevant: if there is<br />

such a thing as clearly ethical behaviour, such<br />

abuse is clearly unethical. It can take the form<br />

of, first, falsifying data to support a preconceived,<br />

often favoured, hypothesis; second, manipulating<br />

data, often statistically, for the same reason<br />

(or manipulating techniques used – deliberately<br />

including leading questions, for example); third,<br />

using data selectively, that is, ignoring or excluding<br />

the bits that don’t fit one’s hypothesis; and fourth,<br />

going beyond the data, in other words, arriving<br />

at conclusions not warranted by them (or overinterpreting<br />

them). But even malpractice as serious<br />

as these examples cannot be controlled by fiat:<br />

ethical injunctions would hardly be appropriate<br />

in this context, let alone enforceable. The only<br />

answer (in the absence of professional monitoring)<br />

is for the researcher to have a moral code that is<br />

‘rationally derived and intelligently applied’, to use<br />

the words of the philosopher, R. S. Peters, and to<br />

be guided by it consistently. Moral competence, like<br />

other competencies, can be learned. One way of<br />

acquiring it is to bring interrogative reflection to<br />

bear on one’s own code and practice, e.g. did I<br />

provide suitable feedback, in the right amounts, to<br />

the right audiences, at the right time In sum, ethical<br />

behaviour depends on the concurrence of ethical<br />

thinking which in turn is based on fundamentally<br />

thought-out principles. Readers wishing to take<br />

the subject of data abuse further should read Peter<br />

Medawar’s (1991) elegant and amusing essay,<br />

‘Scientific fraud’, in D. Pike (ed.) The Threat and the<br />

Glory: Reflections on Science and Scientists. Oxford:<br />

Oxford University Press, and also Broad, W. and<br />

Wade, N. (1983) Betrayers of Truth: Fraud and Deceit<br />

in the Halls of Science.NewYork:Century.<br />

5 SENSITIVE EDUCATIONAL <strong>RESEARCH</strong><br />

1 See also Walford (2001: 38) in his discussion of<br />

gaining access to UK public schools, where an early<br />

question that was put to him was ‘Are you one of<br />

us’<br />

2 Walford (2001:69) comments on the very negative<br />

attitudes of teachers to research on UK independent<br />

schools, the teachers feeling that researchers had<br />

been dishonest and had tricked them, lo<strong>ok</strong>ing only<br />

for salacious, sensational and negative data on the<br />

school (e.g. on bullying, drinking, drugs, gambling<br />

and homosexuality).<br />

8 HISTORICAL AND DOCUMENTARY<br />

<strong>RESEARCH</strong><br />

1 By contrast, the historian of the modern period,<br />

i.e. the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, is more<br />

often faced in the initial stages with the problem<br />

of selecting from too much material, both at the<br />

stage of analysis and writing. Here the two most<br />

common criteria for such selection are the degree of<br />

significance to be attached to data, and the extent<br />

to which a specific detail may be considered typical<br />

of the whole.<br />

2 However, historians themselves usually reject such<br />

adirectapplicationoftheirworkandrarelyindulge<br />

in it on the grounds that no two events or<br />

contextual circumstances, separated geographically<br />

and temporally, can possibly be equated. As the<br />

popular sayings go, ‘History never repeats itself’ and<br />

so, ‘The only thing we can learn from History is that<br />

we can learn nothing from History’.<br />

3 Thomas, W. I. and Znaniecki, F. (1918) The<br />

Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Chicago,<br />

IL: University of Chicago Press. For a fuller<br />

discussion of the monumental work of Thomas and<br />

Znaniecki, see Plummer, K. (1983) Documents of<br />

Life: An Introduction to the Problems and Literature<br />

of a Humanistic Method. London: Allen & Unwin,<br />

especially Chapter 3, The Making of a Method.<br />

See also Madge, J. (1963) The Origin of Scientific<br />

Sociology. London: Tavistock. For a critique of<br />

Thomas and Znaniecki, see Riley, M. W. (1963)<br />

Sociological Research 1: A Case Approach.NewYork:<br />

Harcourt, Brace & World.<br />

4 Sikes,P., Measor,L. and Woods,P. (1985) Teacher<br />

Careers.Lewes:Falmer.SeealsoSmith,L.M.(1987)<br />

Kensington Revisited. Lewes: Falmer; Goodson,I.<br />

and Walker, R. (1988) Putting life into educational<br />

research. In R. R. Sherman and R. B. Webb<br />

(eds) Qualitative Research in Education: Focus and<br />

Methods. Lewes:Falmer;Acker,S.(1989)Teachers,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!