12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

15 Questionnaires<br />

Introduction<br />

The field of questionnaire design is vast. This<br />

chapter provides a straightforward introduction<br />

to its key elements, indicating the main issues<br />

to be addressed, some important problematical<br />

considerations and how they can be resolved.<br />

The chapter follows a sequence in designing a<br />

questionnaire that, it is hoped, will be useful for<br />

researchers. The serial order is:<br />

ethical issues<br />

approaching the planning of a questionnaire<br />

operationalizing the questionnaire<br />

structured, semi-structured and unstructured<br />

questionnaires<br />

types of questionnaire items<br />

closed and open questions compared<br />

scales of data<br />

the dangers of assuming knowledge or<br />

viewpoints<br />

dichotomous questions<br />

multiple choice questions<br />

rank ordering<br />

rating scales<br />

constant sum questions<br />

ratio data questions<br />

open-ended questions<br />

matrix questions<br />

contingency questions, filters and branches<br />

asking sensitive questions<br />

avoiding pitfalls in question writing<br />

sequencing the questions<br />

questionnaires containing few verbal items<br />

the layout of the questionnaire<br />

covering letters or sheets and follow-up letters<br />

piloting the questionnaire<br />

practical considerations in questionnaire<br />

design<br />

<br />

<br />

administering questionnaires<br />

self-administered questionnaires<br />

postal questionnaires<br />

processing questionnaire data.<br />

It is suggested that researchers may find it useful<br />

to work through these issues in sequence, though,<br />

clearly, a degree of recursion is desirable.<br />

The questionnaire is a widely used and useful<br />

instrument for collecting survey information,<br />

providing structured, often numerical data,<br />

being able to be administered without the<br />

presence of the researcher, and often being<br />

comparatively straightforward to analyse (Wilson<br />

and McLean 1994). These attractions have to be<br />

counterbalanced by the time taken to develop,<br />

pilot and refine the questionnaire, by the possible<br />

unsophistication and limited scope of the data<br />

that are collected, and from the likely limited<br />

flexibility of response (though, as Wilson and<br />

McLean (1994: 3) observe, this can frequently<br />

be an attraction). The researcher will have to<br />

judge the appropriateness of using a questionnaire<br />

for data collection, and, if so, what kind of<br />

questionnaire it should be.<br />

Ethical issues<br />

The questionnaire will always be an intrusion into<br />

the life of the respondent, be it in terms of time<br />

taken to complete the instrument, the level of<br />

threat or sensitivity of the questions, or the possible<br />

invasion of privacy. Questionnaire respondents are<br />

not passive data providers for researchers; they are<br />

subjects not objects of research. There are several<br />

sequiturs that flow from this.<br />

Respondents cannot be coerced into completing<br />

aquestionnaire.Theymightbestronglyencouraged,<br />

but the decision whether to become involved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!