12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62 THE ETHICS OF EDUCATIONAL AND SOCIAL <strong>RESEARCH</strong><br />

unknown, unforeseen problems and difficulties<br />

lying in wait (Kimmel 1988). Baumrind (1964),<br />

for example, warns of the possible failure on<br />

the researchers’ part to perceive a positive<br />

indebtedness to their subjects for their services,<br />

perhaps, she suggests, because the detachment<br />

which investigators bring to their task prevents<br />

appreciation of subjects as individuals. This kind<br />

of omission can be averted if the experimenters<br />

are prepared to spend a few minutes with subjects<br />

afterwards in order to thank them for their<br />

participation, answer their questions, reassure<br />

them that they did well, and generally talk to<br />

them for a time. If the research involves subjects<br />

in a failure experience, isolation or loss of selfesteem,<br />

for example, researchers must ensure that<br />

the subjects do not leave the situation more<br />

humiliated, insecure and alienated than when<br />

they arrived. From the subject’s point of view,<br />

procedures which involve loss of dignity, injury<br />

to self-esteem, or affect trust in rational authority<br />

are probably most harmful in the long run and<br />

may require the most carefully organized ways<br />

of recompensing the subject in some way if the<br />

researcher chooses to carry on with those methods.<br />

With particularly sensitive areas, participants<br />

need to be fully informed of the dangers of serious<br />

after-effects. There is reason to believe that at<br />

least some of the obedient subjects in Milgram’s<br />

(1963) experiments (see Chapter 21) came away<br />

from the experience with a lower self-esteem,<br />

having to live with the realization that they were<br />

willing to yield to destructive authority to the<br />

point of inflicting extreme pain on a fellow human<br />

being (Kelman 1967). It follows that researchers<br />

need to reflect attitudes of compassion, respect,<br />

gratitude and common sense without being too<br />

effusive. Subjects clearly have a right to expect that<br />

the researchers with whom they are interacting<br />

have some concern for the welfare of participants.<br />

Further, the subject’s sensibilities need also to<br />

be taken into account when the researcher comes<br />

to write up the research. It is unacceptable for<br />

researchers to show scant regard for subjects’<br />

feelings at the report stage. A related and not<br />

insignificant issue concerns the formal recognition<br />

of those who have assisted in the investigation, if<br />

such be the case. This means that whatever form<br />

the written account takes, be it a report, article,<br />

chapter or thesis, and no matter the readership for<br />

which it is intended, its authors must acknowledge<br />

and thank all who helped in the research, even<br />

to the extent of identifying by name those whose<br />

contribution was significant. This can be done in<br />

aforeword,introductionorfootnote.Allthisis<br />

really a question of commonsensical ethics.<br />

Ethical problems in educational research can<br />

often result from thoughtlessness, oversight or<br />

taking matters for granted. Again, researchers<br />

engaged in sponsored research may feel they<br />

do not have to deal with ethical issues,<br />

believing their sponsors to have them in hand.<br />

Likewise, each researcher in a collaborative<br />

venture may take it for granted, wrongly, that<br />

colleagues have the relevant ethical questions in<br />

mind, consequently appropriate precautions go by<br />

default. A student whose research is part of a course<br />

requirement and who is motivated wholly by selfinterest,<br />

or academic researchers with professional<br />

advancement in mind, may overlo<strong>ok</strong> the ‘oughts’<br />

and ‘ought nots’.<br />

Arelatedissuehereisthatitisunethicalfor<br />

the researcher to be incompetent in the area<br />

of research. Competence may require training<br />

(Ticehurst and Veal 2000: 55). Indeed an ethical<br />

piece of research must demonstrate rigour in the<br />

design, conduct, analysis and reporting of the<br />

research (Morrison 1996b).<br />

An ethical dilemma that is frequently discussed<br />

is in the experiment. Gorard (2001: 146) summarizes<br />

the issue as being that the design is<br />

discriminatory, in that the control group is being<br />

denied access to a potentially better treatment<br />

(e.g. curriculum, teaching style). Of course, the<br />

response to this is that, in a genuine experiment,<br />

we do not know which treatment is better, and<br />

that, indeed, this is the point of the experiment.<br />

Ethical dilemmas<br />

Robson (1993: 33) raises ten questionable practices<br />

in social research:<br />

<br />

involving people without their knowledge or<br />

consent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!