12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

390 ACCOUNTS<br />

By way of example, Edwards (1993) explores<br />

discourse data emanating from a visit to a<br />

greenhouse by 5-year-old pupils and their teacher,<br />

to see plants being propagated and grown. His<br />

analysis shows how children take understandings<br />

of adults’ meanings from the words they hear and<br />

the situations in which those words are used. And<br />

in turn, adults (in this case, the teacher) take<br />

from pupils’ talk, not only what they might mean<br />

but also what they could and should mean. What<br />

Edwards describes as ‘the discursive appropriation<br />

of ideas’ (Edwards 1991) is illustrated in Box 17.4.<br />

Discourse analysis requires a careful reading<br />

and interpretation of textual material, with<br />

interpretation being supported by the linguistic<br />

evidence. The inferential and interactional aspects<br />

of discourse and discourse analysis suggest the<br />

need for the researcher to be highly sensitive<br />

to the nuances of language (Coyle 1995: 247).<br />

In discourse analysis, as in qualitative data<br />

analysis generally (Miles and Huberman 1984),<br />

the researcher can use coding at an early stage of<br />

analysis, assigning codes to the textual material<br />

being studied (Parker 1992; Potter and Wetherall<br />

1987). This enables the researcher to discover<br />

patterns and broad areas in the discourse. With<br />

this achieved the researcher can then re-examine<br />

the text to discover intentions, functions and<br />

consequences of the discourse (examining the<br />

speech act functions of the discourse, e.g. to impart<br />

information, to persuade, to accuse, to censure, to<br />

encourage etc.). By seeking alternative explanations<br />

and the degree of variability in the discourse, it is<br />

possible to rule out rival interpretations and arrive<br />

Box 17.4<br />

Concepts in children’s talk<br />

81 Sally Cuttings can grow to plants.<br />

82 Teacher [writing] ‘Cuttingscangrow–,’insteadofsaying‘to<br />

83 plants you can say ‘grow, = [ ]<br />

in : to plants.’<br />

84 Sally = You wrote Chris tina.<br />

85 Teacher Oops. Thank you. I’ll do this again. ‘Cuttings can<br />

86 grow into plants’. That’s also good. What is a cutting,<br />

87 Christina<br />

88 Christina Acuttingis,umm,Idon’tknow.<br />

89 Teacher Who knows what a cutting is besides Sally Sam.<br />

90 Sam It’s when you cut off a–, it’s when you cut off a piece<br />

91 of a plant.<br />

92 Teacher Exactly, and when you cut off a piece of a plant, what do<br />

93 you<br />

[<br />

then do with it<br />

]<br />

to make it grow If you leave<br />

it–,<br />

94<br />

95 X<br />

Put it in soil.<br />

96 Teacher Well, sometimes you can put it in soil.<br />

97 Y And [ ]<br />

plant it,<br />

98 Teacher But what –, wait, what else could you put it in<br />

99 Sam Put it in a pot<br />

100 Teacher Pot, with soil, or...There’sanotherway.<br />

101 Sally Iknowanotherway.=<br />

102 Teacher =Wait.Sam,doyouknowNo=<br />

103 Sam =Dirt.<br />

104 Teacher No, it doesn’t have to do with s –, it’s not a solid, it’s<br />

105 a liquid. What [ ]<br />

liquid -,<br />

106 Meredith<br />

Water.<br />

107 Teacher Right. [...]<br />

Source:Edwards1993

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!