12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

524 QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS<br />

Box 24.19<br />

Difference test for a paired sample<br />

Paired samples test<br />

Paired differences<br />

95 % confidence<br />

interval of the difference<br />

Mean SD SE mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)<br />

Pair 1 Maths-Science 14.45 27.547 0.871 12.74 16.16 16.588 999 0.000<br />

Box 24.20<br />

Effect size in analysis of variance<br />

Maths<br />

ANOVA<br />

Sum of squares df Mean square F Sig.<br />

Between groups 7078.619 3 2359.540 4.205 0.006<br />

Within groups 337266.2 601 561.175<br />

Total 344344.8 604<br />

differential weightings due to sample size<br />

variations. The two most frequently used indices of<br />

effect sizes are standardized mean differences and<br />

correlations (Hunter et al. 1982:373),although<br />

non-parametric statistics, e.g. the median, can be<br />

used. Lipsey (1992: 93–100) sets out a series of<br />

statistical tests for working on effect sizes, effect<br />

size means and homogeneity.<br />

Muijs (2004: 126) indicates that a measure of<br />

effect size for cross-tabulations, instead of chisquare,<br />

should be phi, whichisthesquarerootof<br />

the calculated value of chi-square divided by the<br />

overall valid sample size. He gives an example:<br />

‘if chi-square = 14.810 and the sample size is 885<br />

then phi = 14.810/885 = 0.0167 and then take<br />

the square root of this = 0.129’.<br />

Effect sizes are susceptible to a range of<br />

influences. These include (Coe 2000):<br />

<br />

Restricted range: the smaller the range of scores,<br />

the greater is the possibility of a higher effect<br />

size, therefore it is important to use the standard<br />

<br />

<br />

deviation of the whole population (and not just<br />

one group), i.e. a pooled standard deviation,<br />

in calculating the effect size. It is important to<br />

report the possible restricted range or sampling<br />

here (e.g. a group of highly able students rather<br />

than, for example, the whole ability range).<br />

Non-normal distributions: effect size usually<br />

assumes a normal distribution, so any<br />

non-normal distributions would have to be<br />

reported.<br />

Measurement reliability: the reliability (accuracy,<br />

stability and robustness) of the instrument<br />

being used (e.g. the longer the test, or the more<br />

items that are used to measure a factor, the<br />

more reliable it could be).<br />

There are downloadable software programs<br />

available that will calculate effect size simply by<br />

the researcher keying in minimal amounts of data,<br />

for example:<br />

<br />

The Effect Size Generator by Grant Devilly:<br />

http://www.swin.edu.au/victims

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!