12.01.2015 Views

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

RESEARCH METHOD COHEN ok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

482 CONTENT ANALYSIS AND GROUNDED THEORY<br />

cause redundancy as it may be counter-productive<br />

repetition; constraints on text length may inhibit<br />

reference to the theme; some topics may require<br />

much more effort to raise than others.<br />

(Weber 1990: 73)<br />

The researcher can summarize the inferences<br />

from the text, lo<strong>ok</strong> for patterns, regularities and<br />

relationships between segments of the text, and<br />

test hypotheses. The summarizing of categories<br />

and data is an explicit aim of statistical techniques,<br />

for these permit trends, frequencies, priorities and<br />

relationships to be calculated. At the stage of<br />

data analysis there are several approaches and<br />

methods that can be used. Krippendorp (2004:<br />

48–53) suggests that these can include:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

extrapolations: trends, patterns and differences<br />

standards: evaluations and judgements<br />

indices: e.g. of relationships, frequencies of<br />

occurrence and co-occurrence, number of<br />

favourable and unfavourable items<br />

linguistic re-presentations.<br />

Once frequencies have been calculated, statistical<br />

analysis can proceed, using, for example:<br />

factor analysis: to group the kinds of response<br />

tabulation: of frequencies and percentages<br />

cross-tabulation: presenting a matrix where the<br />

words or codes are the column headings and<br />

the nominal variables (e.g. the newspaper, the<br />

year, the gender) are the row headings<br />

correlation: to identify the strength and<br />

direction of association between words,<br />

between codes and between categories<br />

graphical representation: for example to report<br />

the incidence of particular words, concepts,<br />

categories over time or over texts<br />

regression: to determine the value of one<br />

variable/word/code/category in relationship to<br />

another – a form of association that gives exact<br />

values and the gradient or slope of the goodness<br />

<br />

of fit line of relationship – the regression line<br />

multiple regression: to calculate the weighting<br />

of independents on dependent variables<br />

structural equation modelling and LISREL<br />

analysis: to determine the multiple directions<br />

of causality and the weightings of different<br />

<br />

associations in a pathway analysis of causal<br />

relations<br />

dendrograms: tree diagrams to show the relationship<br />

and connection between categories<br />

and codes, codes and nodes.<br />

The calculation and presentation of statistics<br />

is discussed in Chapters 24–26. At this stage<br />

the argument here suggests that what starts as<br />

qualitative data – words – can be converted into<br />

numerical data for analysis.<br />

If a less quantitative form of analysis is<br />

required then this does not preclude a qualitative<br />

version of the statistical procedures indicated<br />

here. For example, one can establish linkages and<br />

relationships between concepts and categories,<br />

examining their strength and direction (how<br />

strongly they are associated and whether the<br />

association is positive or negative respectively).<br />

Many computer packages will perform the<br />

qualitative equivalent of statistical procedures.<br />

It is also useful to try to pursue the identification<br />

of core categories (see the later discussion of<br />

grounded theory). A core category is that which<br />

has the greatest explanatory potential and to<br />

which the other categories and subcategories<br />

seem to be repeatedly and closely related (Strauss<br />

1987: 11). Robson (1993: 401) suggests that<br />

drawing conclusions from qualitative data can<br />

be undertaken by counting, patterning (noting<br />

recurrent themes or patterns), clustering (of<br />

people, issues, events etc. which have similar<br />

features), relating variables, building causal<br />

networks, and relating findings to theoretical<br />

frameworks.<br />

While conducting qualitative data analysis<br />

using numerical approaches or paradigms may<br />

be criticized for being positivistic, one should<br />

note that one of the founders of grounded theory<br />

(Glaser 1996) is on record as saying that not only<br />

did grounded theory develop out of a desire to<br />

apply a quantitative paradigm to qualitative data,<br />

but also paradigmal purity was unacceptable in the<br />

real world of qualitative data analysis, in which<br />

fitness for purpose should be the guide. Further,<br />

one can note that Miles and Huberman (1984)<br />

strongly advocate the graphic display of data as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!