10.07.2015 Views

Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture

Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture

Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

At two weeks from planting it was appliedtreatments with growth promoter (P&R) andfoliar fertilizers (Folimax and Agriphyte) inaccordance with experimental variants.Harvesting was done from the first half ofDecember, by variants.During the experimentation period has beencarried out observations, measurements anddeterminations, which were used specificworking methods namely:Phenological determinations: sowing date, dateof emerging, date of planting and date ofharvest.Production potential was determined byregistering of the mass of each head/ rosetteharvested by variants.The results were interpreted statistically byanalysis of variance - Student test (Ardelean etal., 2007).Laboratory analysis at lettuce:--- agrochemical analysis: N-NO 3 and N-NO 23-content, P-PO 4 content, K + content.- biochemical analysis: vitamin C content(mg/100 fresh product), soluble carbohydrates(%), acidity (%), chlorophyll (mg/100 freshproduct). Were harvested lettuce samples forlaboratory analysis of three different harvestsand results are average of these samples.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSFrom the analysis results can be observed thatthe average weight of the head of the May Kinglettuce ranged from 158 g (untreated control) to175 g (Agriphyte). At variety Great Lakes 118the average weight of the head ranged between152 g (untreated control) to 168 g (Folimax).At Lollo Rossa the average weight of therosette varied between 140 g (untreatedcontrol) to 157 g (Folimax) (Table 3, Figure 2).Table 3. The influence of growth promoter and foliarfertilizers treatments on the production of lettuce-2012VarietyAverage weight of theVariant head/ rosette, kg/pl. t/haControl 0.158 25.28Folimax 0.170 27.20May KingAgriphyte 0.175 28.00P& R 0.163 26.08Control 0.152 24.32Folimax 0.168 26.88Great LakesAgriphyte 0.166 26.56P& R 0.160 25.60Control 0.140 22.40Folimax 0.157 25.12Lollo RossaAgriphyte 0.150 24.00P& R 0.146 23.36Concerning the production of lettuce May Kingit was between 25.280 t/ha (control) and 28.000t/ha (Agriphyte). It can be observed that theapplied treatments favored average weight ofthe heads and the production. At Great Lakes118 variety, on first place it was the varianttreated with foliar fertilizers Folimax (26.880 t/ha) compare to the control (24.320 t/ ha). AtLollo Rossa variety, on first place it was thevariant treated with foliar fertilizers FolimaxFigure 2. Production at lettuce experiences, 2012139(25.120 t/ ha) compare to the control (22.400 t/ha). If we take into account the influence ofvariety on the lettuce production (Table 4), itcan be observed that both varieties Great Lakes118 and May King have made a significantlydistinct difference of production (2.120 t/ ha,respectively 2.920 t/ha) compare to LolloRossa.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!