10.07.2015 Views

Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture

Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture

Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for production of localized irrigation on appleapplication in the in the south-eastern RomaniaconditionsMATERIALS AND METHODSThe entire work is based on the results ofpersonal research on the effect of appleirrigation in Moara Domneasca Farmconditions.Researches to develop this work wereconducted in 2008-2011 period. Relief localityis included in the Romanian Plain, Vlasiei Plainsubdivision, in the transition from steppe toforest area. The general relief is flat withnumerous small bumps and depressions, calleddales, of different shapes and sizes.Groundwater is at different depths from 6 m to10 m, depending on the terrain. In 2008, theaccumulated rainfall was 378 mm, in 2009 was559,4 mm, in 2010 was 494,8 mm and in 2011was 288 mm. All values are below the 50-yearannual average of 548.0 mm.The soil type at the Moara Domneasca Farm isreddish brown (preluvosoil), softness subtype.To achieve the objectives, it was imposed anorganization of some tri factorial typeexperiences with the following experimentalfactors:Factor A-variety: Generos and Florina.Factor B-irrigation norms: non irrigatedwitness; drop 2 litres / hour; drop 4 litres /hour.Factor C-fertilization levels: 2,5 kilo Megasolor 5 kilo Megasol.Drip irrigation was started from March 20,administering it daily, for 4 hours. In periodswhere there were registered rainfalls, theirrigation was discontinued. In general, thenumber of watering recommended is 2-5.Fertilization consisted of Megasol productadministration, which is a soluble fertilizerdesigned specifically for use in advancedirrigation systems, especially through the drip,and foliar and basic fertilization. On fruit treeswere applied 5 splashes using the dosesmentioned above.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSThe influence of the variety on theproduction of applesTable 1. The Influence of the variety on the productionof apples, average of 2008-2011Prod.Varietyt/ha% Dif. t/ha Signif.Generous 16,53 100,1 0,02 -Florina 16,49 99,9 -0,02 -Average 16,51 100 - MtDl 5% = 0,244 t / ha Dl 1% = 0,563 t / ha Dl 0,1% =1,791 t / haTo analyze the influence of the variety onproduction, we have established as term ofcomparison-stander-by the average productionof the two analyzed varieties, 16,51 t/ha.The Generous variety achieved a production of16,53 t/ha, at a non-significant difference (0,02t/ha) compared to the stander-by.Florina variety enrolled with a production of16,49 t/ha, at a non-significant differencecompared to the stander-by, but negative.We can say that the varieties have a similargenetic potential production (Table 1)The influence of the drip irrigation levels onthe production of applesTable 2. The Influence of the drip irrigation levels on theproduction of apples, average of 2008-2011Irrigation normProd.t/ha%Diff.t/haSignif.Non-irrigated 13,75 100 - Mt2 l/h 16,51 120,1 2,76 ***4 l/h 19,27 140,1 5,52 ***DL 5% = 0,140 t/ha DL 1% = 0,203 t/ha DL 0,1% =0,305 t/haAs shown in Table 2., the irrigation leveldetermined increases of the yields obtained andincreases statistically confirmed as highlysignificant for the two levels of irrigationapplied.Compared to the control (irrigated) productionstandards achieved at 2 l/h were 20,1% higher,which means an increase of 2,76 t/ha, verysignificant.An increase of 5,52 t/ha was recorded also atthe irrigated variant with 4 l/h, which means anadditional crop of 40,1%.The influence of the level of fertilization onthe production of apples94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!