Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture

More documents

Recommendations

Info

“Clapp’s Favorite” in 2011 where the height ofthe tree constituted 170 cm and “Max RedBartlett” in 2012 with the height of the treeconstituted 200 cm. The highest values for thisparameter was registered in “Abbé Fétel” inboth seasons, with the height of the treeconstituted 250 cm in 2011 and 280 cm in 2012whereas in other varieties the recorded valueswere intermediate (table 1).Values of the trunk thickness comprisedbetween 2.10 and 2.93 cm in 2011 registeredthe pear tree varieties: “Max Red Bartlett: (2.70cm), “Clapp’s Favorite” (2.10 cm), “BeurréBosc” (2.62 cm), “Alexander Lucas” (2.50 cm),“Abbé Fétel” (2.93 cm) and “Conference”(2.88 cm). In 2012 the recorded values wereplaced between 2.80-3.82 cm with lowestvalues at “Clapp’s Favorite” (2.80 cm) andhighest at “Conference” variety (3.82 cm).Growth of trees, expressed as a trunk crosssection area registers extreme values,comprised between 3.5 cm 2 at “Clapp’sFavorite” variety and 6.7 cm 2 at “Abbé Fétel”variety in 2011. In the next year the valuescomprised between 6.2 cm 2 at “Clapp’sFavorite” variety and 11.6 cm 2 at “Max RedBartlett”. The data from 2011 were statisticallyprocessed as compared to the average of thetrial, used as control and pointed out verysignificant positive differences at “Abbé Fétel”and significant positive differences in case of“Conference” variety. In 2012 two varietiesshowed significant positive differences fromthe average of experience, respectively“Conference” and “Max Red Bartlett”.Significant negative differences, as comparedwith average, taken as control, registered the“Clapp’s Favorite” variety. Vigour withinsignificant differences, as compared withaverage had the varieties “Beurré Bosc”,“Clapp’s Favorite”, “Alexander Lucas”, “MaxRed Bartlett” in 2011 and “Abbé Fétel”,“Beurré Bosc” and “Alexander Lucas” in 2012.The average of annual vegetative shoot growthin 2011 was 147.8 cm/tree in “Clapp’sFavorite”, 257.8 cm/tree in “Beurré Bosc”,288.2 cm/tree in “Alexander Lucas”, 320.1cm/tree in “Conference”, 327.7 cm/tree in“Max Red Bartlett” and the highest value(413.5 cm/tree) in “Abbé Fétel”. In 2012 theregistered values were as follows: 346.5cm/tree in “Alexander Lucas”, 360.1 cm/tree in“Clapp’s Favorite”, 386.8 cm/tree in “AbbéFétel”, 405.6 cm/tree in “Conference” and 411cm/tree in “Beurré Bosc” varieties (fig. 3). In2011 trees from “Conference”, “Abbé Fétel”and “Max Red Bartlett” produced more longshoots than the average of trial (292.5 cm/tree).In 2012 the varieties mentioned above andadditional “Beurré Bosc” produced long shootsmore than the average (384 cm/tree).In 2011, a large number of vegetative spursproduced “Conference” (68) and “Beurré Bosc”(45) while “Max Red Bartlett” and “Clapp’sFavorite” formed the fewest number of spurs(39 and 38).Table 1. Vegetative growth in 2011 and 2012DifferencesTransversal cross sectionTree height (cm) Trunk thickness (cm)Pear variety(cm 2 as to average Significance)(cm 2 )2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012Abbé Fétel 250 280 2.93 3.48 6.7 9.5 +1.3 +0.35 NConference 210 250 2.88 3.82 6.5 11.4 +1.1 +2.25Beurré Bosc 190 250 2.62 3.28 5.4 8.5 0 -0.65 N NClapp’s Favorite 170 220 2.10 2.80 3.5 6.2 -1.9 -2.95 NAlexander Lucas 180 210 2.50 3.14 4.9 7.7 -0.5 -1.45 N NMax Red Bartlett 180 200 2.70 3.84 5.7 11.6 +0.3 +2.45 NAverage 196.6 235 2.62 3.39 5.4 9.15 - - - -DL 5 %=0.80 cm 2 (2011) N= not significant DL 5%=1.8 cm 2 (2012)DL 1%=1.14 cm 2 *= significant difference DL1%=2.5 cm 2DL 0.1%=1.65 cm 2 **= distinctive significant difference DL 0.1%=3.7 cm 2263
In 2012 “Alexander Lucas” produce the largestnumber of vegetative spurs (122), followed byBeurré Bosc“ (80) and the lowest number wasregistered in “Clapp’s Favorite” (table 3).The total length of the flowering shootsregistered the highest value in both years for“Max Red Bartlett” (119.4 cm/tree in 2011 and395.8 cm/tree in 2012) and the lowest value for“Beurré Bosc” (16.8 cm/tree in 2011 and 293.2cm/tree in 2012) (table 2). The varieties “MaxRed Bartlett”, “Conference” and “AbbéFétel” produced over than 300 cm/tree offlowering brindles in 2012 (table 2).The values of offshoots length varied between0 and 26.1 cm/tree in 2011 and 7.8 -107.8cm/tree in 2012 with the highest valueregistered in “Max Red Bartlett” variety in2011 (26.1 cm/tree) and “Alexander Lucas”variety in 2012 (107.8 cm/tree) (table 2).“Alexander Lucas” variety formed the largestnumber of flowering dards in 2011 (67) and“Abbé Fétel” variety in 2012 (33) (table 3).Trees formed also fruit bourses, one of themremained undeveloped others are formed bydifferent shoots as spurs, dards or spurs anddards. “Abbé Fétel” and “Conference” formedconstantly spurs, dards and bourses but thehighest number of bourses with dards wasregistered in 2011 for “Alexander Lucas”variety (99) followed by “Clapp’s Favorite”variety with 54 bourses with dards (table 3).Table 2. Flowering shoots (cm/tree) registered between2011-2012Flowering shoots (cm/tree) Pear variety Brindles Offshoots Total length‘11 ‘12 ‘11 ‘12 ‘11 ‘12A. Fétel 33.1 302.2 11.8 61.8 44.9 364Conf. 27.5 321.7 15.3 14.5 42.8 336.2Beurré Bosc 16.8 213.5 0 7.8 16.8 221.3Clapp Fav. 17.6 271.2 0 22 17.6 293.2Al. Lucas 103.8 250 8.6 107.8 112.4 357.8Max RedBart.93.3 363.1 26.1 32.7 119.4 395.8Figure 3. Long shoots registered (cm/tree) between2011-2012Pear varietyTable 3. Average number/tree and type of vegetative and flowering shootsVegetativeshoots (no/tree)Spurs Flowering shoots (no/tree)Dards Fruit bourses undeveloped with spurs with dards with spurs&dards2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012Abbé Fétel 49 51 24 33 3 5 57 6 5 1 4 0Conference 68 54 25 10 0 16 10 61 0 0 0 0Beurré Bosc 54 83 9 5 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0Clapp’s Favorite 38 50 14 3 0 3 5 2 54 0 0 0Alexander Lucas 45 122 67 24 0 3 5 11 99 0 0 0Max Red Bartlett 39 60 11 22 7 0 54 57 1 8 0 0CONCLUSIONSThe results showed that the studied pearvarieties have capability to growth in Bucharestarea.In term of tree height we registered insignificantdifferences between self rooted varietiesthat could be interpreted as a uniformity ofgrowth of studied cultivars.In 2011 trunk cross section area showed differencesallowing cultivars to be ranked in orderof decreasing vigor: “Abbé Fétel”, “Conference”,“Max Red Bartlett”, “Beurré Bosc”,“Alexander Lucas” and “Clapp’s Favorite”. In264
Page 2:
SCIENTIFIC PAPERSSERIES B. HORTICUL
Page 5 and 6:
SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Bekir Erol AK
Page 7:
Fructification - Florin Constantin
Page 10:
Phenological Studies on Some Variet
Page 14:
Scientific Papers. Series B, Hortic
Page 17 and 18:
Table 2. The organoleptic appreciat
Page 19 and 20:
processes become even slower and th
Page 21 and 22:
- usingselectedbacteriafromm Leucon
Page 23 and 24:
To organoleptic analysis of the win
Page 25 and 26:
works were pickling the cucumbers i
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
days after removal of weeds by burn
Page 32:
it appears that the culture has gro
Page 35 and 36:
Maintainance of the genetic structu
Page 37 and 38:
Table 3. Interaction variety of dwa
Page 39 and 40:
Experimental scheme is situated in
Page 41 and 42:
improvement especially laboratory s
Page 43 and 44:
Table 1 shows the type 2x3x2 trifac
Page 45 and 46:
Neamtu G., Gheorghe Campeanu, Carme
Page 47 and 48:
Experience consisted of the followi
Page 49 and 50:
Table 7. Total production on plantV
Page 51 and 52:
vineyard, several methods were used
Page 53 and 54:
Table 4. Structure and number and r
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
gets serious role through the ferme
Page 60 and 61:
Table 3. Element content of the ber
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Figure 4. The length of internodes
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
The process of fruit forming was de
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Compomist F1 hybrid reaches value o
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76:
Figure 2. Experimental results repr
Page 79 and 80:
and total number of tubers per plan
Page 81 and 82:
and quality of organic potatoes for
Page 83 and 84:
Petri dishes, the pathogenic fungi
Page 85 and 86:
Variant 4R 2 11.0 4.0 15.0 7.0 22.0
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Analyzing the dynamics of the total
Page 92 and 93:
Table 2. Indicative data on volumes
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Table 3. The Influence of the level
Page 98 and 99:
Table 8. The Influence of irrigatio
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Figure 1. The aspect of apples from
Page 104:
Conclusions on changes in chemicalc
Page 107 and 108:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSRaspberry is
Page 109 and 110:
CONCLUSIONSAs a result of scientifi
Page 111 and 112:
observations were made on phenologi
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 1. Flowering period and blac
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
content, A-acidity content) to the
Page 120 and 121:
sugar accumulated in grapes and 1,0
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Figure 2. DryerFigure 3. Programmer
Page 126 and 127:
Appearance of the apricots after 5
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
where: P F represent the coordinate
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Table 2. The production obtained at
Page 136 and 137:
As shown in figures 5 and 6 the vit
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
At two weeks from planting it was a
Page 142 and 143:
If we take into account the both fa
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
F1 - + infectedF2 - + infectedF3 +
Page 148:
HORTICULTURALBIODIVERSITY ANDGENETI
Page 151 and 152:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSFruit charac
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
The chorology maps of Artemisia alb
Page 158 and 159:
Figure 5. Chorology of Artemisia le
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162:
Molecular differentiation showed a
Page 165 and 166:
The characterization of the grapevi
Page 167 and 168:
Figure 4. Amino acid profile of the
Page 169 and 170:
Table 4. The significance of differ
Page 171 and 172:
The studied phenophases (table 1),
Page 173 and 174:
REFERENCESCapusan Janina, 2013. Rez
Page 175 and 176:
Neoaliturus fenestratus Herrich-Sch
Page 177 and 178:
occurrence in western part of Roman
Page 179 and 180:
Pop 3 = Population 3 obtained by cr
Page 181 and 182:
well adapted in our country, and th
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Variations in acidity of the variet
Page 188:
grape. Analele Universitatii din Cr
Page 191 and 192:
Flow cytometry has proved to be an
Page 193 and 194:
cell nuclei, using chromosome count
Page 195 and 196:
Figure 1. Prekos F1Figure 4. Prekos
Page 197 and 198:
Interpretation of the results conce
Page 199 and 200:
Photo 1- Redhaven (Control)The Roma
Page 201 and 202:
Dry matter (determinate refractomet
Page 203 and 204:
was evaluated by using a large-size
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
During the growing season have been
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Likewise, vitamin C content of ‘G
Page 214 and 215: Scientific Papers. Series B, Hortic
Page 216 and 217: Figure 2. Air temperature (°C) in
Page 218: REFERENCESAnconelli S., Antolini G.
Page 221 and 222: Taking into the account these and t
Page 223 and 224: postharvest decays in fruits and ve
Page 225 and 226: manure semifermentated. In vegetati
Page 227 and 228: Figure 1. Prima Cl. 1022 varietyThe
Page 229 and 230: temperature required for a differen
Page 231 and 232: MATERIALS AND METHODSTo accomplish
Page 233 and 234: climate (IH4), becomes for this yea
Page 235 and 236: quantities of sugar accumulated in
Page 237 and 238: ibosomal to investigate 13 species
Page 239 and 240: Biogeography of Genus MangiferaTwo
Page 241 and 242: productionand uses. Center for trop
Page 243 and 244: analysis of variance to express the
Page 245 and 246: highlighted by a correlation coeffi
Page 247 and 248: without heat and in open field. Cro
Page 249 and 250: ut the fruit had a reduced number o
Page 251 and 252: Genetic autochthonous heritage wasi
Page 253 and 254: Table 1. The main characteristics o
Page 258 and 259: Data were subjected to statistical
Page 260 and 261: Also, the dry biomass and root leng
Page 266: 2012 the order was “Conference”
Page 269 and 270: microspore to mature pollen, determ
Page 271 and 272: microspores at certain date. Micros
Page 273 and 274: viin utilizate ca genitori potentia
Page 275 and 276: The objective of this paper, is to
Page 277 and 278: Table 1. Relationship between germi
Page 282 and 283: Figure 2. Tassels lengthIn case of
Page 284: ORNAMENTAL PLANTS,DESIGN ANDLANDSCA
Page 287 and 288: of Chisinau, also the old parks. Fo
Page 289 and 290: y cambium on the very center - meth
Page 291 and 292: flower is fully colored. Postharves
Page 293 and 294: Results from table 8 shows that Mar
Page 298 and 299: Pinus sylvestris ‘Gold Coin’, R
Page 302 and 303: Figure 4. Excelsa (H 18/1)Descripti
Page 306 and 307: Figure 1. Plants in cellular trays
Page 308: espectively 69%, followed by hybrid
Page 311 and 312: observations made on the plants of
Page 313 and 314: The values of pH diminished in all
Page 315 and 316:
Figure 5. Content of total soluble
Page 317 and 318:
Figure 1. Plan of Bran domain (Ion
Page 319 and 320:
Carol the second, her brother, on h
Page 321 and 322:
Figure 14. Tea house in the natural
Page 323 and 324:
Cults, and in conformity with the c
Page 325 and 326:
consult the scientific novelties an
Page 327 and 328:
,,The restoration is the methodolog
Page 329 and 330:
MATERIALS AND METHODSThe chorology
Page 331 and 332:
Merce, 2011; Zamfirescu, 2010) (IAS
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
experiment because it shows and ill
Page 338:
among all the administrations, exce
Page 341 and 342:
solution known as AKN. Content: pot
Page 343 and 344:
As shown in the figure, Chrysal is
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
MotivationsOfferprospectingCustomer
Page 350:
conclude the presented case, with k
Page 353 and 354:
Also, comparative studies, concerni
Page 355 and 356:
done before. Also the speed of the
Page 357 and 358:
as Marcellus theatre or Trajan foru
Page 359 and 360:
ian regime, by huge contradictions
Page 361 and 362:
Pyongyang, the hidden cityThe capit
Page 363 and 364:
“ordinary” buildings as the gen
Page 365 and 366:
- The Writer’s Rotunda“The cons
Page 367 and 368:
Figure 4. Vegetation planRegarding
Page 369 and 370:
Figure 9. BenchesVasesThere are 4 k
Page 371 and 372:
REFERENCESPanoiu A., 2011, Evolutia
Page 373 and 374:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSResults of t
Page 375 and 376:
Figure 5. Average growth rate of
Page 377 and 378:
In 2012 there were higher onset tem
Page 379 and 380:
fact that root injuries is the majo
Page 381 and 382:
We recommend that the species and c
Page 383 and 384:
and parameters of quality. The phys
Page 385 and 386:
AESTHETICALLEVEL OFAPPROACHLEVEL OF
Page 387 and 388:
REFERENCESArchibugi F., 1997. The E
Page 389 and 390:
Figure 1. Optimized version of comp
Page 391 and 392:
CONCLUSIONSThe optimized version (F
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
etween 182-212 g/l, the lowest valu
Page 398:
CONCLUSIONSThis study showed that 2
Page 401 and 402:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONSFor this pur
Page 403 and 404:
according to quality class.The calc
Page 405 and 406:
third party countries who wish to b
Page 407 and 408:
Stakeholder comments concerned nota
Page 409 and 410:
Figure 2. The „Eco-leaf” logo o
Page 411 and 412:
identified to facilitate its tracea
Page 413 and 414:
- Analysis reports;This document ma
Page 416 and 417:
Page 418 and 419:
Table 1. Sampling procedures applic
Page 420 and 421:
Table 2. Example of sampling proced
Page 422 and 423:
should be 5 kg.” According to thi
Page 424 and 425:
Page 426 and 427:
One of the first and simplest condi
Page 428 and 429:
of RIN transcription factor in ethy
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
oriented towards the centre of the
Page 434 and 435:
Figure 5. Macroscopic view of the c
Page 436 and 437:
Related to the process of the evolu
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440 and 441:
efore it is printed using the main
Page 442 and 443:
Imposition of the pot is done every
Page 444 and 445:
Figure 8. Test of Strength Vetiver
Page 446 and 447:
Page 448 and 449:
Table 3 defines LSD test for genoty
show all

Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?