10.07.2015 Views

Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture

Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture

Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Howell test we did not find significant differencesbetween the administrations.Figure 9. Basic fluorescenceOn the 6 th day Control, on the 8 th Oasis, and onthe 10 th Bioplant values show a suddenincrease, then fall dramatically. It sensesdeficiency in energy assimilation, thus trying tocompensate by increasing the antennae pigmentorganization. Chrysal and Sapientia did notindicate such a deficiency. This time weapplied the SPSS Tukey test which revealed nodifferences between doses.Figure 10. Stomatal conductanceStomatal conductance indicates the way thestomata operate. Measurements were madeusing the Ciras 2 system. Values tend to beconsistent with water consumption and thevalues measured in the stem. Chrysal stands outin this respect, followed by Control, but thelatter gives up after the 9 th day. Bioplant alsoshows potential till day 13. Oasis lasts until day12. After applying the Games-Howell test theresults show major differences between thesolutions especially with Sapientia, howeverChrysal and Bioplant show similar results.CONCLUSIONSFrom flowering point of view in the case of the,Hydrangea we have reached the best resultswith the help of the Chrysal preservatives,closely followed by the Bioplant and thenOasis.The physiological aspect of the flowers in theChrysal treatment were better than that of otherflowers. At the end of the experiment theseflowers were still alive, so their vase life got 10days longer. The Bioplant prolonged the vaselife with 8 days, and the Oasis with 6 days.Expenditures for the purchase of thesesolutions are worth all she money because theeffects are clearly visible. Compared to thecontrol, Chrysal and Bioplant solution havealmost doubled durability of cut flowers in avase.REFERENCESFodorpataki L., 2010. Növényélettan és ökofiziológiailaboratóriumi gyakorlatok, UBB, Cluj Napoca.Horváth Zs., 2001. Virágkötészet. MezogazdaságiSzaktudás kiadó, Budapest.Klincsek P., 1990. Virágköto kalauz. Zrínyi Nyomdakiadó, Budapest.Szabó J., V.Hegyi I., 2005. Virágköto iskola. Mezogazdakiadó, Budapest.Schmidt G., 2001. Növényházi dísznövényektermesztése. Mezogazda kiadó, Budapest.The Beauty of Chrysal, 2009. CHRYSAL PremiumFlower care. SUM és TÁRSA KFT, Budapest.343

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!