11.07.2015 Views

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There is some debate on what constitutes an adequate sample size <strong>for</strong> structural equation modelling(SEM). Some researchers consider a sample size <strong>of</strong> 150 is adequate, while some specify sample size interms <strong>of</strong> indicator-variable: respondent ratio (Keney, 1998). So going by <strong>the</strong> second rule, a sample size <strong>of</strong>300 would be adequate to capture desired variability in <strong>the</strong> intended research. It is planned to take seventyfive data points <strong>for</strong> each <strong>of</strong> category <strong>of</strong> male, female and age group <strong>of</strong> 18- 30 years and age group <strong>of</strong> 31-50years, a total <strong>of</strong> 75 * 4 = 300 data point.Intended contribution:The proposed research is an attempt to provide affective base to explain <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> relationshipmarketing. By explaining <strong>the</strong> mediating role <strong>of</strong> consumer feelings <strong>of</strong> gratitude, and consumer feelings <strong>of</strong>obligation, <strong>the</strong> proposed work attempts to explain <strong>the</strong>ory or relationship marketing. It is attempted toexplain <strong>the</strong> boundary conditions in which customer feels gratitude and would attempt to developrelationships and conditions in which customer feels obligations and show although higher purchaseintentions, yet would result in lower level <strong>of</strong> customer loyalty.It is also attempted to segregate <strong>the</strong> relationship investments which contribute to long term relationshipsfrom those relationship investments which contribute to short term relationships. This provides a basis <strong>for</strong>managers and marketing practitioners to increase <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir relationship marketingprogramme.ReferencesBagozzi, R. P. (1995). Reflections on Relationship Marketing in Consumer Marketing. Journal <strong>of</strong><strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Marketing Science, 23, 272-277Baker, M. J. (1992). Research Methods. Marketing Review, 3 (Winter), 167-193.Bar-Tal, D., Bar-Zohar, Y., Greenberg, M. S., & Hermon, M. (1977). Reciprocity behavior in <strong>the</strong>relationship between donor and recipient and between harm-doer and victim. Sociometry, 40, 293-298.Bartlet, M. Y. and DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and Pro Social Behaviour. Psychological Science, 17,319-325.Ben-Ze‘ev, A. (2000). The Subtlety <strong>of</strong> Feelings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Berry J., William R. Dardcn, and Milch Criffiii (1994). "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic andUtilitarian Shopping Value." Journal <strong>of</strong> Consumer Research. 20 (4), 644-56.Berry, Leonard L. (1996), ―Retailers with a Future,‖ Marketing Management, 5 (Spring), 39–46Berry. Leonard L. (1995). "Relationship Marketing <strong>of</strong> Services— Growing Interest, EmergingPerspectives." Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Marketing Science. 23 (4), 236-45.Blau. Peter (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York; John Wiley & Sons.Bolten, R. (1998). A dynamic model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> customer‘s relationship with a continuousservice provider: <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> satisfaction, Marketing Science, 17, 45-65.Bollen, Kenneth A, (1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!