11.07.2015 Views

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QuickTime and adecompressorare needed to see this picture.Temporal Orientation and Temporal Construal TheoryTemporal orientation, akin to temporal focus (Liu and Aaker 2006), refers to an individual's focuson immediate gains or distant rewards (Bergadaa 1990). For example, temporal orientation hasbeen found to influence <strong>the</strong> persuasiveness <strong>of</strong> healthcare messages and willingness to engage inhealthful behaviors (Orbell and Hagger 2006). Cotte and Ratneshwar (1998) suggest thatalthough some individuals focus on ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> long-term or short-term, both orientations typicallyco-exist in <strong>the</strong> same person. Situational priming can enhance or lessen one's long-term orientation(Liu and Aaker 2007). A key question <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> current study is how such temporal priminginteracts with message concreteness in an online health communication.According to <strong>the</strong> Temporal Construal Theory (Trope and Liberman 2003), people constructdifferent representations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same in<strong>for</strong>mation depending on whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation pertainsto <strong>the</strong> near or distant future. In particular, Trope and Liberman proposes that individuals useabstract mental models to represent in<strong>for</strong>mation about <strong>the</strong> distant future. These models consist <strong>of</strong>general, superordinate, decontextual, and essential features <strong>of</strong> events. In contrast, individuals useconcrete mental models to present in<strong>for</strong>mation from <strong>the</strong> near future. Such models tend to includedetailed, subordinate, contextual, and incidental features <strong>of</strong> events. Supporting this proposition,Kardes, Cronley, and Kim (2006) found that <strong>the</strong> mere presence <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> target brandsencourages individuals to present <strong>the</strong> brand using concrete mental models, which in turn affectsspontaneous preference <strong>for</strong>mation, preference-behavior consistency. Based upon <strong>the</strong> samepremise, Trope and Liberman (2003) contend that <strong>the</strong> reverse causal path should also hold. Thatis, in<strong>for</strong>mation presented in abstract terms will make an individual envision <strong>the</strong> action in <strong>the</strong>distant future, while in<strong>for</strong>mation presented in concrete terms will make an individual picture <strong>the</strong>action in <strong>the</strong> near future (Trope and Liberman 2003). In sum, according to temporal construal<strong>the</strong>ory (Trope and Liberman 2003), in<strong>for</strong>mation presented in concrete (abstract) terms tends toshorten (leng<strong>the</strong>n) temporal distance. In <strong>the</strong> current context, it is expected that congruency will beperceived when short- (long-) term orientation is primed and concrete (abstract) message is <strong>the</strong>nviewed in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> an online anti-secondhand smoke website.Regulatory Fit, Processing Fluency and FlowProcessing fluency is defined as <strong>the</strong> experienced ease or fluency <strong>of</strong> ongoing processing(Unkelbach 2007). A regulatory fit between an individual‘s regulatory orientation andin<strong>for</strong>mation will lead to more fluent processing ,which in turn accounts <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> persuasioneffects (Lee and Aaker 2004). Supporting this argument, a burgeoning literature has demonstrated<strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> regulatory fit on message persuasion (e.g., Aaker and Lee 2006; Lee and Aaker

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!