11.07.2015 Views

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hairstyles are ‗Afro-centric‘ or ‗Eurocentric‘. The choice by black women to use hair straighteners andhair extensions may <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e not be due <strong>the</strong> desire to meet <strong>the</strong> standards <strong>of</strong> white beauty, but a result <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> convergence <strong>of</strong> cultures (Spronk 2009). Though Nyamnjoh (2002) and Spronk (2009) argue from <strong>the</strong>perspective <strong>of</strong> black women in Africa, similar arguments apply to African-American women as well.Patton (2006), arguing from <strong>the</strong> perspectives <strong>of</strong> African-American women, contends that when blackwomen choose straightened hairstyles, it is not because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir desire to emulate whites but a matter <strong>of</strong>having a modern hairstyle. Nei<strong>the</strong>r is <strong>the</strong>ir choice a political statement, ―...but simply a matter <strong>of</strong> choice‖(hooks 1995: 123). But Oka<strong>for</strong> (2007) demurs and argues that globalization is an extension <strong>of</strong> white idealsthat involves victimization and leads black women, in <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> modernity, to choose Caucasianinspiredstyles at <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> African inspired looks. This argument is in contradiction to Houlberg(1976) who suggests that au<strong>the</strong>nticity does not imply rigidity, and that one can adopt new ways whilststaying true to <strong>the</strong>ir identity. Put differently, embracing modernity does not render one‘s ‗African-ness‘compromised (Maqoma 2002). As Englis, Solomon, and Ashmore (1994: 52) point out, globalization hasnot just led to <strong>the</strong> westernisation <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r continents, ―...Western standards are evolving to include moreethnically diverse templates‖. To illustrate this, Patton (2006) suggests that physical features associatedwith black women such as fuller lips, body curves and curly hair have become admirable, resulting inwomen who do not naturally possess <strong>the</strong>se attributes, spending money on cosmetic procedures andhairstyle in order to obtain what <strong>the</strong>y do not naturally have.In conclusion, though black women in South Africa live in a society whose culture and values differsignificantly from that <strong>of</strong> African-American women, black women from both societies share a commonpreference in relation to hairstyle choices and <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> hair extensions. However, <strong>the</strong> factors affecting<strong>the</strong>ir behaviour as consumers may be different due to <strong>the</strong> wide gap in <strong>the</strong> cultural contexts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> twosocieties. Culture can be operationalised using values (Usunier & Lee 2009) and cultural values are knownto correlate with consumer behaviour (Henry 1976). Values are defined as enduring, desirabletranssituational goals that serve as guiding principles in <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> a person or o<strong>the</strong>r social entity (Rokeach1973; Schwartz 1994). An influential <strong>the</strong>ory in <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> values is <strong>the</strong> values contents and structure<strong>the</strong>ory (Schwartz 1994; Schwartz et al. 2001) which uses <strong>the</strong> well-known cultural scale called <strong>the</strong> PortraitValues Questionnaire (PVQ) to make cultural assessments. Schwartz‘s PVQ identifies ten motivationaltypes <strong>of</strong> values namely; power, achievement, hedonism, stimulation, self-direction, benevolence,universalism, tradition, con<strong>for</strong>mity, and security.The ten motivational types <strong>of</strong> values may be summarised by two orthogonal dimensions <strong>of</strong> valuesnamely self-enhancement vs. self-transcendence and openness to change vs. conservation. According toSchwartz (1992: 43), <strong>the</strong> self-enhancement vs. self-transcendence orthogonal dimension <strong>of</strong> values refers to―values in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong>y motivate people to enhance <strong>the</strong>ir own personal interests (evenat <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs) versus to transcend selfish concerns and promote <strong>the</strong> welfare <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, close anddistant, and <strong>of</strong> nature‖. The values types that make up <strong>the</strong> self-enhancement value domain and <strong>the</strong> selftranscendencevalue domain are power and achievement, and benevolence and universalism respectively.On <strong>the</strong> self-enhancement vs. self-transcendence orthogonal dimensions, <strong>the</strong> self-enhancement values arein conflict with <strong>the</strong> self-transcendence values. The openness to change vs. conservation orthogonaldimension <strong>of</strong> values refers ―values in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong>y motivate people to preserve <strong>the</strong>status quo and <strong>the</strong> certainty it provides in relationships with close o<strong>the</strong>rs, institutions, and traditions versusfollowing <strong>the</strong>ir own emotional and intellectual interests in unpredictable and uncertain directions‘(Schwartz, 1992: 43). The value types that make up <strong>the</strong> openness to change value domain and <strong>the</strong>conservation value domain are self-direction, stimulation and hedonism, and tradition, con<strong>for</strong>mity, andsecurity, respectively. On this orthogonal dimension, <strong>the</strong> openness to change values are in conflict with<strong>the</strong> conservation values. In <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> South African values, Burgess (2002, 2011) found that SouthAfricans placed more priority on <strong>the</strong> values security, benevolence, and universalism. In <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong>South African, <strong>the</strong>se three value types constitute self-transcendence. The value type security in SouthAfrica has been known to locate in <strong>the</strong> self-transcendence to reflect <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> justice and equalityra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> preservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> status quo (Schwartz, et al. 2001).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!