Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...
Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...
Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>the</strong>ir products based primarily on demographic variables and control not only <strong>the</strong> content, but, <strong>the</strong> volume andtiming <strong>of</strong> marcom as well. (McCarthy 1964)Inherent in all <strong>the</strong>se marketing communication approaches were <strong>the</strong> basic elements <strong>of</strong> persuasion. The goal<strong>of</strong> much marcom was to persuade customers or prospects to try <strong>the</strong> promoted product. The assumption was, once <strong>the</strong>user had tried, <strong>the</strong>y would be satisfied and would return <strong>for</strong> additional purchases. (McCarthy 1964) Thus, <strong>the</strong>established marketing communication model, developed some 75 or so years ago, is still <strong>the</strong> same as is in use today.Communicate, persuade, generate a purchase and let <strong>the</strong> product prove its value over time. This resultingacquisition-retention model drove <strong>the</strong> system. Thus, <strong>the</strong> basic marketing communication model was based onacquisition which could be achieved through persuasion and occasional reminders.In spite <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major economic, distribution and technological changes that have occurred, that marcommodel still describes <strong>the</strong> marketing communication system used by large number <strong>of</strong> consumer product companies inestablished markets in <strong>the</strong> 21 st century. (Schultz and Schultz 1998) The basic premise <strong>of</strong> marketing communicationmanagers seems to be: if it is still working, why change?Since <strong>the</strong> basic model <strong>of</strong> marketing communication was customer acquisition, generated through customertrial and product per<strong>for</strong>mance, <strong>the</strong> persuasion model made inherent good sense. Consumers had little in<strong>for</strong>mationabout <strong>the</strong> product o<strong>the</strong>r than what <strong>the</strong> marketer provided and had even more limited recourse in talking back to <strong>the</strong>marketer. Accordingly, customer-focused persuasion models were built which generally assumed that customers orprospects moved through some type <strong>of</strong> communication process on <strong>the</strong> way to a purchase decision. One simplemodel was <strong>the</strong> AIDA approach (Attention, Interest, Desire and Action) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1900s. (Schultz and Kitchen2000) More sophisticated models, based on assumptions inherent in western-based behavioral consumer psychology,developed in <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 20 th century such as <strong>the</strong> Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> Effects. The Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> Effects modelassumes marketers drive customers through a purchasing process, using multiple communication tools, deliveredthrough various <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> outbound message and incentive delivery systems. (Lavidge and Steiner 1961) Based on<strong>the</strong> messages delivered, marketers could influence <strong>the</strong> ―consumer purchase process‖ and, as important, measure <strong>the</strong>progress <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program through various, generally attitudinally- based, -research techniques.A stylized model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> Effects model is shown in Exhibit Two.Exhibit Two Goes About HereHierarchy <strong>of</strong> Effects ModelThe support <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> Effects approach is based on a <strong>the</strong>oretical concept articulated by Lavidge andSteiner (1961) in <strong>the</strong> early 1960s. (Lavidge and Steiner 1961)The model assumes that consumers move throughsome type <strong>of</strong> communication process on <strong>the</strong> way to a purchase decision. The movement through thatpersuasion/communication model is controlled by <strong>the</strong> marketing organization. That is, by investing in marketingcommunications, <strong>the</strong> marketer ―pushes‖ <strong>the</strong> customer or prospect through <strong>the</strong> process, on <strong>the</strong> way to a purchase. Asshown, <strong>the</strong> consumer or prospect moves from awareness to knowledge to preference to conviction. And, at somepoint, a purchase may actually be made, although <strong>the</strong> Hierarchy is essentially a communication model. (Lavidge andSteiner 1961) The business-to-business marcom managers have adapted this same approach with <strong>the</strong>ir ―funnelsystem‖.As shown, <strong>the</strong> L&S model is linear, one way, outbound and assumes that <strong>the</strong> marketer is in control <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong>variables, that is, <strong>the</strong> 4Ps (product, price, place and promotion) which influence <strong>the</strong> consumer‘s purchase decision.While <strong>the</strong>re are challenges to <strong>the</strong> Hierarchy model, (Barry 1987) it continues to be <strong>the</strong> most well established andaccepted in key marketing organizations around <strong>the</strong> world.To summarize, <strong>the</strong> traditional marketing communication system being used in established markets todayassumes (a) willing and interested prospects with disposable incomes who (b) are served by third party channels and