11.07.2015 Views

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>the</strong>ir products based primarily on demographic variables and control not only <strong>the</strong> content, but, <strong>the</strong> volume andtiming <strong>of</strong> marcom as well. (McCarthy 1964)Inherent in all <strong>the</strong>se marketing communication approaches were <strong>the</strong> basic elements <strong>of</strong> persuasion. The goal<strong>of</strong> much marcom was to persuade customers or prospects to try <strong>the</strong> promoted product. The assumption was, once <strong>the</strong>user had tried, <strong>the</strong>y would be satisfied and would return <strong>for</strong> additional purchases. (McCarthy 1964) Thus, <strong>the</strong>established marketing communication model, developed some 75 or so years ago, is still <strong>the</strong> same as is in use today.Communicate, persuade, generate a purchase and let <strong>the</strong> product prove its value over time. This resultingacquisition-retention model drove <strong>the</strong> system. Thus, <strong>the</strong> basic marketing communication model was based onacquisition which could be achieved through persuasion and occasional reminders.In spite <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major economic, distribution and technological changes that have occurred, that marcommodel still describes <strong>the</strong> marketing communication system used by large number <strong>of</strong> consumer product companies inestablished markets in <strong>the</strong> 21 st century. (Schultz and Schultz 1998) The basic premise <strong>of</strong> marketing communicationmanagers seems to be: if it is still working, why change?Since <strong>the</strong> basic model <strong>of</strong> marketing communication was customer acquisition, generated through customertrial and product per<strong>for</strong>mance, <strong>the</strong> persuasion model made inherent good sense. Consumers had little in<strong>for</strong>mationabout <strong>the</strong> product o<strong>the</strong>r than what <strong>the</strong> marketer provided and had even more limited recourse in talking back to <strong>the</strong>marketer. Accordingly, customer-focused persuasion models were built which generally assumed that customers orprospects moved through some type <strong>of</strong> communication process on <strong>the</strong> way to a purchase decision. One simplemodel was <strong>the</strong> AIDA approach (Attention, Interest, Desire and Action) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1900s. (Schultz and Kitchen2000) More sophisticated models, based on assumptions inherent in western-based behavioral consumer psychology,developed in <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 20 th century such as <strong>the</strong> Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> Effects. The Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> Effects modelassumes marketers drive customers through a purchasing process, using multiple communication tools, deliveredthrough various <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> outbound message and incentive delivery systems. (Lavidge and Steiner 1961) Based on<strong>the</strong> messages delivered, marketers could influence <strong>the</strong> ―consumer purchase process‖ and, as important, measure <strong>the</strong>progress <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program through various, generally attitudinally- based, -research techniques.A stylized model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> Effects model is shown in Exhibit Two.Exhibit Two Goes About HereHierarchy <strong>of</strong> Effects ModelThe support <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hierarchy <strong>of</strong> Effects approach is based on a <strong>the</strong>oretical concept articulated by Lavidge andSteiner (1961) in <strong>the</strong> early 1960s. (Lavidge and Steiner 1961)The model assumes that consumers move throughsome type <strong>of</strong> communication process on <strong>the</strong> way to a purchase decision. The movement through thatpersuasion/communication model is controlled by <strong>the</strong> marketing organization. That is, by investing in marketingcommunications, <strong>the</strong> marketer ―pushes‖ <strong>the</strong> customer or prospect through <strong>the</strong> process, on <strong>the</strong> way to a purchase. Asshown, <strong>the</strong> consumer or prospect moves from awareness to knowledge to preference to conviction. And, at somepoint, a purchase may actually be made, although <strong>the</strong> Hierarchy is essentially a communication model. (Lavidge andSteiner 1961) The business-to-business marcom managers have adapted this same approach with <strong>the</strong>ir ―funnelsystem‖.As shown, <strong>the</strong> L&S model is linear, one way, outbound and assumes that <strong>the</strong> marketer is in control <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong>variables, that is, <strong>the</strong> 4Ps (product, price, place and promotion) which influence <strong>the</strong> consumer‘s purchase decision.While <strong>the</strong>re are challenges to <strong>the</strong> Hierarchy model, (Barry 1987) it continues to be <strong>the</strong> most well established andaccepted in key marketing organizations around <strong>the</strong> world.To summarize, <strong>the</strong> traditional marketing communication system being used in established markets todayassumes (a) willing and interested prospects with disposable incomes who (b) are served by third party channels and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!