11.07.2015 Views

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

However, a number <strong>of</strong> studies have indicated <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r a moderate or a weak relationship betweenenvironmental attitudes and ecological behavior (Axelrod and Lehman, 1993; Mostafa, 2007), and <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong>attitudinal components alone may not accurately predict actual behavior (Foxall, 1984; Tarrant and Cordell, 1997;Antonides and Van Raaij, 1998).Hence, affective component was found to also comprise <strong>of</strong> anxieties, expectations and emotive responses <strong>of</strong> anindividual. Since, it is <strong>the</strong> emotional 'judgment‘ <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual about <strong>the</strong> consequences <strong>of</strong> his actions to <strong>the</strong>biophysical environment (Bruhn, 1978), environmentally conscious behavior is not necessarily <strong>the</strong> consequence <strong>of</strong>only rational insight into <strong>the</strong> appropriate action (Urban, 1986).Consumer belief that <strong>the</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> an individual acting alone can make a difference, conceptualized as ‗PerceivedConsumer Effectiveness or PCE‘, is ano<strong>the</strong>r factor determining an individual‘s willingness to engage inenvironmentally conscious consumption behaviour (Kinnear, Taylor, and Sadrudin,1974). PCE, defined as ‗<strong>the</strong>evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> self in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> issue‘ (Berger and Corbin 1992), is distinct from environmental concernsor attitudes. Since, consumer‘s concern about <strong>the</strong> environmental issues might not easily translate into proenvironmentalbehaviors; it is supposed that, individuals with a strong belief that <strong>the</strong>ir environmentally consciousbehavior will result in a positive outcome are more likely to engage <strong>the</strong>mselves in such behaviors in support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irconcerns <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment. Both, perceived consumer effectiveness and environmental concerns have foundsignificant and positive effects on environmental behavior, attitude and interest (Antil, 1978; Webster, 1975; Weinerand Doescher, 1991;Straughan, Roberts, 1999;Lepisto, 1974;Van and Dunlap, 1981; Samdahl and Robert,1989;Rowlandset al., 2003;Ay and Ecevit, 2005).Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> researchers have emphasized on including pro-environmental behavior also as an indicator <strong>of</strong>environmental consciousness in terms <strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong> ―incidence‖ and ―frequency‖ <strong>of</strong> engaging in <strong>the</strong> environmentalfriendly behavior. But, this paper holds <strong>the</strong> view that environmental consciousness is <strong>the</strong> mental state variable andconsumer‘s pro-environmental behavior is linked to environmental consciousness as its outcome. It is expected thatenvironmental consciousness <strong>of</strong> individuals may vary from a basic level, which may be reflected as a generalconcern towards <strong>the</strong> environment to a more specific one thus resulting into more product specific behavior. It is,however, not certain that an individual‘s environmental consciousness will directly lead to behavior change, as <strong>the</strong>re

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!