11.07.2015 Views

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

examine <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> service failure and brand reputation on customer coping strategies andsatisfaction.This study makes important contributions to service literature. First, we examine <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> customer coping inservice failure encounters. Although psychology literature proposes various coping strategies to deal with stress fromeconomic crisis, health-related outcomes and depression, it is unclear whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are applicable in service failurecontext. Specifically, we demonstrate <strong>the</strong> different coping strategies customers employ to manage stress from servicefailures influenced by its magnitude and brand reputation. Second, we show that failure severity and brandreputation interacts to influence customer satisfaction and that coping strategies to mediate this relationship.Although previous studies have examined <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> severity in influencing coping strategies and satisfaction, weemphasize <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> brand reputation in determining customer coping strategies and satisfaction. The rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>article is organized as follows: first, we present a review <strong>of</strong> relevant literature on failure severity, brand reputation,coping strategies and satisfaction in developing <strong>the</strong> research hypo<strong>the</strong>ses. Second, <strong>the</strong> experimental study carried outto test <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>ses is presented. The paper concludes with <strong>the</strong> discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results, implications <strong>for</strong>academicians and practitioner and limitation and future research directions.Literature ReviewCoping StrategiesMany researchers have indicated how consumers cope to deal with stressful consumption related experiences(Duhachek, 2005; Duhachek and Kelting, 2009 and Gabbott et al, 2010). According to Lazarus and Folkman (1984),coping is ―<strong>the</strong> constant changing <strong>of</strong> cognitive andbehavioral ef<strong>for</strong>ts to manage specific external and /or internal demands that are appraisedas taxing or exceeding <strong>the</strong> resources <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> person.‖ More recently, Gabbott et al (2010) defined coping as ―privateinternalization by <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>of</strong> any negative situational effects associated with service failure.‖ Aappraisal <strong>the</strong>orystates that an individual‘s coping process is driven by a three-step process <strong>of</strong> cognitive appraisal (Folkman andLazarus, 1988). First, <strong>the</strong> individual‘s assesses whe<strong>the</strong>r a situation is potentially threatening or not in <strong>the</strong> primaryappriasal process, and in case a threat is identified, individuals experience

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!