11.07.2015 Views

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DiscussionThe key insights from <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> consumers perceptions towards MNP are discussed in <strong>the</strong> following.These insights are <strong>of</strong> great value to <strong>the</strong> marketers as <strong>the</strong>y can frame <strong>the</strong>ir marketing strategies on <strong>the</strong> basis<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se results in order to target consumers.There is a very high level <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> MNP among students. The main source <strong>of</strong> awareness wasnewspapers, and to a lesser extent internet and television. However, even with MNP, at 95% confidencelevel, only 15.6%-27.4% <strong>of</strong> students are considering switching service providers, while 72.6%-84.4% <strong>of</strong>students are not considering switching service providers. In fact, as had been suggested by many experts,it is <strong>the</strong> post-paid customers that are utilising MNP.The main reasons <strong>for</strong> wanting to switch were related to better features <strong>of</strong>fered by competitors, no newschemes or upgradation <strong>of</strong> existing plan, costly value-added services, improper customer service, high callrates, high internet charges, poor network coverage, high SMS charges, frequent network problems, voicequality issues, and hidden charges, i.e. <strong>the</strong> Network/Technical Problems, High Charges, and HiddenCharges & Improper Service factors. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> main reasons <strong>for</strong> not wanting to switch wererelated to satisfaction with current service provider, brand loyalty, no added benefits, same service qualityacross service providers, and same user group plan across service providers, i.e. <strong>the</strong> Brand Loyalty and NoPerceived Differences/Benefits factors. This suggests that service providers are generally seen to <strong>of</strong>fergood quality <strong>of</strong> service, with not much difference between <strong>the</strong>m. In fact, users <strong>of</strong> Vodaphone and Airtelwere very satisfied with <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> service.Thus, <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> MNP has increased competition to some extent. Service providers should keepimproving <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir service and provide more flexible plans in order to retain <strong>the</strong>ir customers,especially if competitors are continuously improving <strong>the</strong>ir services. This especially applies to tariffs - <strong>for</strong>example, when Tata Docomo came out with call charges <strong>of</strong> ―one paisa per second,‖ o<strong>the</strong>r serviceproviders had to modify <strong>the</strong>ir plans (in fact, MTNL subsequently <strong>of</strong>fered a plan with ―half-a-paisa persecond‖). The preferred service providers to switch to were Airtel and Vodaphone, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irsuperior service quality and flexible plans.Thus, MNP has made <strong>the</strong> student segment more price- and quality-sensitive. As a result, service providersmust <strong>of</strong>fer better service at reduced prices in order to retain and expand its customer base. Overall,however, MNP implementation has a limited impact on <strong>the</strong> industry churn rate and pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong>operators. MNP was basically a hype, because all <strong>the</strong> service providers <strong>of</strong>fer virtually <strong>the</strong> same quality <strong>of</strong>service.The study has some limitations. The sample size used <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> study was relatively small. Also, <strong>the</strong>respondents were students from pr<strong>of</strong>essional colleges in Bangalore. Thus, <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study may notbe generalisable to <strong>the</strong> all-India level.There is vast scope <strong>for</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r investigation in <strong>the</strong> same area. The study can be extended to examining <strong>the</strong>impact <strong>of</strong> MNP on o<strong>the</strong>r segments, and in different geographical regions. Also, fur<strong>the</strong>r research canaddress <strong>the</strong> interaction <strong>of</strong> MNP with o<strong>the</strong>r factors affecting brand-switching between mobile telephonyservice providers.ReferencesBhatt, M.V. (2008), ―A Study <strong>of</strong> Mobile Phone Usage among <strong>the</strong> Post-Graduate Students.‖ Indian Journal<strong>of</strong> Marketing, 38(4).Debnath, R.M. and Shankar, R. (2008), "Benchmarking telecommunication service in India: Anapplication <strong>of</strong> data envelopment analysis", Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(5), pp.584 – 598.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!