11.07.2015 Views

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Conceptual frameworkThis section reviews previous research conducted by leading scholars on <strong>the</strong> institutional and cultural context<strong>the</strong>ories. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>ories are deeply analysed to ascertain <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir contributionin relation to <strong>the</strong> topic being researched.In <strong>the</strong> extant literature, a research stream focusing on institutional <strong>the</strong>ory and led by such scholars as Dimaggio andPowell (1983), Scott (2001), Tolbert and Zucker (1996) have sought to explain organizational per<strong>for</strong>mance inspecific markets using <strong>the</strong> institutional <strong>the</strong>ory, a branch <strong>of</strong> organizational <strong>the</strong>ory ( Mahalingan and Levitt, 2007).Despite <strong>the</strong> many diverse definitions <strong>of</strong> institutional <strong>the</strong>ories by scholars, it has mainly been viewed as a <strong>the</strong>oreticallens that is used to study <strong>the</strong> adoption and diffusion <strong>of</strong> organizational <strong>for</strong>ms and practices (Bjorkman et al., 2006). Itis based on <strong>the</strong> principle that organizations are under social influence and pressure to adopt practices such as CRM –which are viewed as being appropriate <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> situation (Scott, 2001). Kirca, Bearden and Roth (2011) assert that <strong>the</strong>institutional <strong>the</strong>ory has gained support from <strong>the</strong> broader marketing community, particularly with regard to justifyinghow <strong>for</strong>eign firms behave in host countries. Hillebrand, Nijholt, and Nijssen (2010) concur when <strong>the</strong>y suggest thatinstitutional processes can be important in explaining <strong>the</strong> adoption <strong>of</strong> CRM practices.Hall and Hall (2001) suggest that cultures can affect <strong>the</strong> way in which a company interacts with its communities.They compare cultures on a scale <strong>of</strong> high to low context. A high context communication or message rests on <strong>the</strong>implicit codes whilst a low context communication achieves <strong>the</strong> opposite. This can be better explained by taking <strong>the</strong>examples <strong>of</strong> Asian cultures where in<strong>for</strong>mation is readily shared amongst members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community. Suchcommunities are collectivists as <strong>the</strong>y abide by <strong>the</strong> principle <strong>of</strong> ―sharing‖ or ―ubuntu‖ as referred to as in SouthAfrica.According to Arnould and Thompson (2005:870), Consumer Culture Theory (CCT) is ‗organised around a coreset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical questions related to <strong>the</strong> relationships among consumers‘personal and collective entities: <strong>the</strong>cultures; underlying experiences, processes and structures; and <strong>the</strong> nature and dynamics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sociologicalcategories through and across which <strong>the</strong>se consumer culture dynamics are enacted and inflected.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!