11.07.2015 Views

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

Index of Paper Presentations for the Parallel Sessions - Academy of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

per<strong>for</strong>mance (Human and Naudé, 2010). To address this issue we focus on product innovation in <strong>the</strong>context <strong>of</strong> Russian emerging economy and its two dimensions – plat<strong>for</strong>m and solution innovation(Sawhney et al, 2006).The research on <strong>the</strong> product innovations developed by Russian firms does not provide sufficientevidence <strong>for</strong> explaining <strong>the</strong> drivers and per<strong>for</strong>mance outcomes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NPD process in Russian firms. Roud(2007) states that <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> innovations in Russian firms is four times lower than in some Europeancountries – e.g. Germany and Sweden. Comparing <strong>the</strong> BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) economiesand <strong>the</strong>ir innovation environment, Kaartemo (2009, p.11) reports that ―Russia seems to be <strong>the</strong> worstpositioned among <strong>the</strong> BRIC countries on <strong>the</strong> innovation front‖. There is even prediction that Russia mightbe excluded from BRIC if innovation will not become central focus <strong>of</strong> economy.The aimed contribution combines re-assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationship between market orientation(MO), innovativeness and firm per<strong>for</strong>mance in emerging economy context, as well as testing mediatingeffect <strong>of</strong> plat<strong>for</strong>m vs. solution innovation. The paper is presented in <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> extended abstract andincludes short literature review and hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>for</strong>mulation, sample description, short overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>results, conclusion and references.Literature review and hypo<strong>the</strong>ses <strong>for</strong>mulationWhile MO concept has been widely tested in multiple markets, its validity <strong>for</strong> trans<strong>for</strong>ming context<strong>of</strong> emerging economies can still be seen as agenda <strong>for</strong> research. With some exceptions <strong>the</strong>re is hardlyenough evidence on how MO constructs (customer and competitor orientation and interfunctionalcoordination) work in emerging economies, including Russia (Akimova, 2000; Greenley, 1995).The discussion on relationship between both constructs <strong>of</strong> market orientation and innovativenesshas been developed in later research (e.g., Grinstein, 2008; Zhou et al, 2005), among which an alternativeapproach has been presented – opposing MO and innovation orientation as a strategic choice <strong>of</strong> a firm(Berthon et al, 1999; Berthon et al, 2004). Thus in <strong>the</strong> latter approach market orientation and innovationorientation are looked at within dichotomy ―to serve or to create‖ (Berthon et al, 1999), discussingopportunities <strong>of</strong> firm‘s focus on just one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two strategic orientations. The more radical innovation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!