16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER THIRTEEN<br />

ATONEMENT: QUMRAN AND THE NEW TESTAMENT<br />

Paul Garnet<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

<strong>The</strong> phrase “to make atonement” in <strong>the</strong> KJV usually translates a Hebrew<br />

word rpeki (kipper), which occurs frequently in <strong>the</strong> sacrifice rules of <strong>the</strong><br />

Pentateuch. This has given <strong>the</strong> word its meaning in modern speech (making<br />

up for wrong done) <strong>and</strong> in Protestant <strong>the</strong>ology, where <strong>the</strong> term is<br />

used to describe <strong>the</strong> saving value of <strong>the</strong> death of Christ. Catholics usually<br />

refer to this as “redemption” ra<strong>the</strong>r than as “atonement.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> early church fa<strong>the</strong>rs often thought of <strong>the</strong> death of Christ as a<br />

“ransom,” following Mark 10:45: “<strong>The</strong> Son of Man came…to give his life<br />

as a ransom for many.” Speculation arose over <strong>the</strong> question, “To whom<br />

was <strong>the</strong> ransom paid: to God or to <strong>the</strong> devil?” <strong>The</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>rs also put a<br />

strong emphasis on <strong>the</strong> death of Christ as a victory over sin, death, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> devil. 1 In <strong>the</strong> Middle Ages, Anselm taught that <strong>the</strong> death of Christ<br />

was efficacious as a satisfaction given to <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r for <strong>the</strong> outrage made<br />

by sin to <strong>the</strong> divine honor; Abelard saw it as a demonstration of God’s<br />

love. More recently, moral-influence <strong>the</strong>ories have pursued Abelard’s line<br />

of thought. Thus, for Socinus, Christ saves by revealing God as Savior<br />

by his life <strong>and</strong> by his death. Anselm’s view is more akin to later views of<br />

Christ’s death as substitutionary: he took humanity’s guilt <strong>and</strong> paid <strong>the</strong><br />

penalty of sin (Lu<strong>the</strong>r, Calvin, Brunner, Berkouwer). 2<br />

In discussing <strong>the</strong> history <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> significance of <strong>the</strong> idea in <strong>the</strong> biblical<br />

period, twentieth-century debate has centered around <strong>the</strong> question of<br />

1. This has been taken up <strong>and</strong> strongly emphasized by Gustaf Aulén, Christus Victor:<br />

An Historical Study of <strong>the</strong> Three Main Types of <strong>the</strong> Idea of <strong>the</strong> Atonement (trans. A. G. Hebert;<br />

London: SPCK, 1931).<br />

2. Besides ibid., for <strong>the</strong> history of <strong>the</strong> Christian doctrine of atonement, see Robert<br />

S. Franks, <strong>The</strong> Work of Christ in Its Ecclesiastical Development (London: Nelson, 1918);<br />

<strong>and</strong>, more recently, Hugh D. McDonald, <strong>The</strong> Atonement of <strong>the</strong> Death of Christ: In Faith,<br />

Revelation, <strong>and</strong> History (Gr<strong>and</strong> Rapids: Baker, 1985).<br />

357

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!