16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

190 THREE SOBRIQUETS, THEIR MEANING AND FUNCTION<br />

between <strong>the</strong>se three levels (see figure 2 below). In <strong>the</strong> following analysis,<br />

I will deal mostly with <strong>the</strong> second, symbolic, or ideological level. 21<br />

Textual level “<strong>The</strong> Wicked Priest” A textual expression, between<br />

<strong>the</strong> lemma <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> exegesis<br />

Symbolic level “<strong>The</strong> Wicked Priest” An evaluation, “bad,”<br />

“wicked,” <strong>the</strong> enemy of <strong>the</strong><br />

righteous community<br />

Historical level “<strong>The</strong> Wicked Priest” A reference to a Hasmonean<br />

high priest (or priesthood)<br />

THE WICKED PRIEST IN THE PESHARIM<br />

<strong>The</strong> designation “<strong>the</strong> Wicked Priest” occurs nine times in <strong>the</strong> 1QpHab<br />

<strong>and</strong> once in 4QpNah. 22 <strong>The</strong> first mention of <strong>the</strong> Wicked Priest is in<br />

1QpHab 1.13, but only as a conjecture since <strong>the</strong> right part of <strong>the</strong> first column<br />

is missing. But <strong>the</strong> presumed lemma cited in line 12 from Hab 1:4<br />

contains <strong>the</strong> words qdc . . . (#$r in <strong>the</strong> MT. In <strong>the</strong> exegesis, <strong>the</strong><br />

Righteous Teacher is clearly mentioned in line 13, so it is not unlikely<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Wicked Priest should also be mentioned here, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong><br />

Teacher. 23 <strong>The</strong>y are mentioned toge<strong>the</strong>r in o<strong>the</strong>r passages such as<br />

1QpHab 9.9–10; 11.4–5. No fur<strong>the</strong>r information could be extracted from<br />

this passage.<br />

<strong>The</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r 1QpHab occurrences of (#$rh Nhwkh are in 8.8; 9.9; 11.4;<br />

12.2; 12.8. From <strong>the</strong> end of column 8, <strong>the</strong>re are three instances, 8.16; 9.16<br />

(emendation); <strong>and</strong> 11.12, where only <strong>the</strong> noun Nhwkh is mentioned.<br />

Now, <strong>the</strong> question is whe<strong>the</strong>r Nhwkh is a short form for (#$rh Nhwkh;<br />

do <strong>the</strong>se two designations refer to <strong>the</strong> same identity? I suggest that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

do. <strong>The</strong>se designations are not used arbitrarily; instead, <strong>the</strong> mentioning<br />

of “<strong>the</strong> Priest” without <strong>the</strong> adjective is “s<strong>and</strong>wiched” in between appearances<br />

of <strong>the</strong> term “<strong>the</strong> Wicked Priest” as follows: 24<br />

21. I have taken this model from Kari Syreeni’s “three-world model,” in “Separation<br />

<strong>and</strong> Identity: Aspects of <strong>the</strong> Symbolic World of Matt 6:1–18, ” NTS 40 (1994):<br />

522–41, esp. 522–23.<br />

22. <strong>The</strong> title “<strong>the</strong> Priest” occurs three times (once as an emendation 1QpHab 9.16),<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> full title “<strong>the</strong> Wicked Priest” occurs six times.<br />

23. Elliger, Habermann, <strong>and</strong> Lohse support this emendation.<br />

24. In all passages except <strong>the</strong> last one, <strong>the</strong> sobriquet st<strong>and</strong>s absolute, after <strong>the</strong><br />

rbdh / r#$p wr#$p as <strong>the</strong> direct reference to <strong>the</strong> lemma just quoted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!