16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

388 QUMRAN AND THE DATINGOFTHEPARABLES OF ENOCH<br />

that in <strong>the</strong> Gospel of Mark, <strong>the</strong> oldest of <strong>the</strong> four, Mark speaks of <strong>the</strong> Son<br />

of Man as a well-known figure. He identifies Jesus with <strong>the</strong> Son of Man<br />

without explaining just who that is. This means that Mark knew who it<br />

was, <strong>and</strong> that he was addressing a group of readers that knew who he<br />

was, as well. For Mark this identification of Jesus with <strong>the</strong> Son of Man is<br />

so important that he places it at <strong>the</strong> very beginning of his book. Let us<br />

reread Mark 2:1–12 which narrates <strong>the</strong> miracle of <strong>the</strong> paralytic, <strong>and</strong> especially<br />

verses 9–11: “Which is easier, to say to <strong>the</strong> paralytic ‘Your sins are<br />

forgiven’ or to say ‘Rise, take up your pallet <strong>and</strong> walk’? But that you may<br />

know that <strong>the</strong> Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins…I say to<br />

you, ‘rise, take up your pallet <strong>and</strong> go home.’” In order to explain his powers<br />

<strong>and</strong> his authority, Jesus declares at least to have <strong>the</strong> same authority as<br />

<strong>the</strong> Son of Man, if not actually to be <strong>the</strong> Son of Man. <strong>The</strong>refore, in Jesus’<br />

day <strong>the</strong> expression “Son of Man” must have been well known, just as <strong>the</strong><br />

words “prophet” <strong>and</strong> “messiah.” <strong>The</strong> only thing that he explains to his<br />

listeners is that <strong>the</strong> Son of Man’s powers are valid on earth as well. <strong>The</strong><br />

structure of Mark’s discourse clearly assumes knowledge of <strong>the</strong> expression<br />

“Son of Man” both on Mark’s part <strong>and</strong> on that of <strong>the</strong> listeners. 36<br />

Some may object that Mark <strong>and</strong> his readers had <strong>the</strong> Son of Man of <strong>the</strong><br />

book of Daniel in mind, interpreted as an existing figure ra<strong>the</strong>r than a<br />

metaphor. At any rate, whichever interpretation we choose Mark’s narration<br />

clearly sees <strong>the</strong> Son of Man as judge <strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong>refore, with <strong>the</strong> power<br />

to forgive, while in Daniel <strong>the</strong> Son of Man presents himself to <strong>the</strong> Ancient<br />

of Days only after <strong>the</strong> judgment. This can be found only in BP. <strong>The</strong> Book<br />

of Parable is an intermediate step between Daniel <strong>and</strong> Mark, or ra<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

between Daniel <strong>and</strong> Jesus. For Mark, Daniel was <strong>the</strong> scriptural point of<br />

reference for legitimizing <strong>the</strong> Son of Man. Mark puts <strong>the</strong> following words<br />

in Jesus’ mouth when presenting himself to <strong>the</strong> High Priest: “You will see<br />

<strong>the</strong> Son of Man sitting at <strong>the</strong> right h<strong>and</strong> of power, <strong>and</strong> coming with ‘<strong>the</strong><br />

clouds of heaven’” (Mark 14:62). <strong>The</strong> expression, “with <strong>the</strong> clouds of<br />

heaven,” is a quote from Daniel 7:13. Even <strong>the</strong> very ease with which BP<br />

was interpreted as a Christian text shows that Jesus/Son of Man is more<br />

similar to <strong>the</strong> Son of Man in BP than to <strong>the</strong> one in Daniel. 37<br />

36. Conviction that <strong>the</strong> concept of Son of Man was a wide-spread apocalyptic concept<br />

can also be found in Norman Perrin, A Modern Pilgrimage in New Testament<br />

Christology (Philadelphia, Fortress, 1974).<br />

37. <strong>The</strong> text of Daniel 7:13–14 presents “one like a Son of Man coming with <strong>the</strong><br />

clouds of heaven…to <strong>the</strong> Ancient of Days” who gave him “dominion <strong>and</strong> glory <strong>and</strong><br />

kingship” over all peoples. <strong>The</strong> function of last judge can be derived from this powerful<br />

figure, but this particular element is lacking in Daniel. <strong>The</strong>re is, however, a far<br />

from banal difference between <strong>the</strong> text of Daniel <strong>and</strong> that of Mark: Daniel says “one<br />

like a Son of Man,” while Mark says “<strong>the</strong> Son of Man.” For Mark <strong>the</strong> Son of Man is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!