16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

454 DEAD SEA SCROLLS AND THE NEW TESTAMENT<br />

remarkable similarities with Paul’s idea of justification of <strong>the</strong> ungodly<br />

(Rom 3:23–26; 4:5). 179<br />

One aspect deserves special consideration. In 1QS 11.9, 12 <strong>and</strong> also<br />

in some o<strong>the</strong>r passages in <strong>the</strong> Thanksgiving Hymns, 180 <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> notion<br />

of “flesh” (r#&b) as a sphere that is characterized basically by sin <strong>and</strong><br />

upheaval, or even as a power that provokes <strong>and</strong> causes evil deeds. 181 A<br />

similar use of “flesh” (r#&b) is known from <strong>the</strong> Pauline Epistles, especially<br />

in <strong>the</strong> anti<strong>the</strong>sis between “flesh” <strong>and</strong> “spirit” (xwr), as in Gal 5:17<br />

or Rom 8:5–9:<br />

For <strong>the</strong> Flesh is actively inclined against <strong>the</strong> Spirit, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit against <strong>the</strong><br />

Flesh. Indeed, <strong>the</strong>se two powers constitute a pair of opposites at war with<br />

one ano<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> result being that you do not actually do <strong>the</strong> very things<br />

you wish to do. (Gal 5:17) 182<br />

For those who exist in terms of <strong>the</strong> flesh take <strong>the</strong> side of <strong>the</strong> flesh,<br />

whereas those who exist in terms of <strong>the</strong> Spirit take <strong>the</strong> side of <strong>the</strong> Spirit.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> flesh’s way of thinking is death, whereas <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s way of thinking<br />

is life <strong>and</strong> peace. Because <strong>the</strong> flesh’s way of thinking is hostility toward<br />

God, for it does not submit itself to <strong>the</strong> law of God; for it cannot. And<br />

those who are in <strong>the</strong> flesh are not able to please God. (Rom 8:5–8) 183<br />

Such a negative use of “flesh” goes far beyond <strong>the</strong> range of meanings<br />

of r#&b in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>. <strong>The</strong>re, r#&b can denote <strong>the</strong> human body <strong>and</strong> its<br />

physical substance or, generally, <strong>the</strong> created being in its weakness <strong>and</strong><br />

mortality. 184 But <strong>the</strong> passages quoted use <strong>the</strong> Greek term sa/rc with a<br />

strong notion of evil <strong>and</strong> iniquity. It even seems to denote a sphere or<br />

power opposed to God <strong>and</strong> his will. Scholars have, <strong>the</strong>refore, tried to explain<br />

<strong>the</strong> Pauline anti<strong>the</strong>sis of “flesh” <strong>and</strong> “spirit” <strong>and</strong> chiefly <strong>the</strong> background<br />

179. Cf. also Siegfried Schulz, “Zur Rechtfertigung aus Gnaden in Qumran und bei<br />

Paulus: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Form und Überlieferungsgeschichte der Qumrantexte,”<br />

ZTK 56 (1959): 155–85; Jürgen Becker, Das Heil Gottes: Heils- und Sündenbegriffe in den<br />

Qumrantexten und im Neuen Testament (SUNT 3; Göttingen: V<strong>and</strong>enhoeck & Ruprecht, 1964).<br />

180. Cf. 1QHa 5.30–33 (= 13.13–16 Sukenik), 1QHa 7.34–35 (= 15.21 Sukenik)<br />

<strong>and</strong> especially 1QHa 12.30–31 (= 4.29–30 Sukenik). References to <strong>the</strong> manuscript<br />

1QHa are quoted according to <strong>the</strong> counting of columns <strong>and</strong> lines in H. Stegemann’s<br />

reconstruction of <strong>the</strong> scroll. <strong>The</strong> reference according to <strong>the</strong> editio princeps by E. L.<br />

Sukenik is given in brackets.<br />

181. Cf. Becker, ibid., 111–12.<br />

182. Translation from J. Louis Martyn, Galatians (AB 33A; New York: Doubleday,<br />

1998), 479.<br />

183. Translation from James D. G. Dunn, Romans 1–8 (WBC 38A; Waco: Word,<br />

1988), 414.<br />

184. Cf. DCH 2:277; Ludwig Koehler, Walter Baumgartner, <strong>and</strong> Johann J. Stamm,<br />

eds., <strong>The</strong> Hebrew <strong>and</strong> Aramaic Lexicon of <strong>the</strong> Old Testament (Leiden: Brill, 1994), 1:164; see<br />

more extensively Gillis Gerleman, “r#&fbf<br />

@; ba¯s 8a¯r Fleisch,” THAT 1:376–79; <strong>and</strong><br />

Nicholas P. Bratsiotis, “r#& fbf @,” ThWAT 1:850–67; ET: TDOT 2:317–32.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!