16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

240 PSALMS AND PSALTERSINTHEDEAD SEA SCROLLS<br />

Jews in <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> first century C.E. Subsequent discussion surrounding<br />

<strong>the</strong> Psalms scrolls concerns four <strong>the</strong>ses developed by S<strong>and</strong>ers,<br />

constituting what Peter Flint terms <strong>the</strong> “Qumran Psalms Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis.” 22<br />

• Gradual Stabilization: 11QPsa (= 11Q5) witnesses to a Psalter that was<br />

being gradually stabilized, from beginning to end.<br />

• Textual Affiliations: Two or more Psalters are represented among <strong>the</strong> scrolls<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Judean Desert.<br />

• Status: 11QPsa (= 11Q5) contains <strong>the</strong> latter part of a true scriptural Psalter.<br />

It is not a secondary collection that is dependant upon Psalms 1–150 as<br />

found in <strong>the</strong> Received Text [MT].<br />

• Provenance: 11QPsa (= 11Q5) was compiled at Qumran <strong>and</strong> thus may be<br />

termed <strong>the</strong> “Qumran Psalter.”<br />

3. ASSESSMENT OF THE “QUMRAN PSALMS HYPOTHESIS”<br />

3.1 Stabilization of <strong>the</strong> Psalter<br />

<strong>The</strong> first <strong>the</strong>sis states that 11QPsa (= 11Q5) witnesses to a Psalter that<br />

was being gradually stabilized, from beginning to end. Any evaluation<br />

must recognize that various groupings of psalms are present in 11QPsa (= 11Q5), o<strong>the</strong>r Psalms scrolls, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Masoretic Psalter. We may regard<br />

agreement between <strong>the</strong> MT <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> scrolls as indicative of stability (e.g.,<br />

Psalms 49 → 50 in 4QPsc [= 4Q85]), while disagreement in order or content<br />

provides evidence of fluidity (e.g., Psalms 103 → 112 in 4QPsb [=<br />

4Q84] illustrates fluidity in order, <strong>and</strong> Psalm 109 → Apostrophe to Zion in<br />

4QPsf [= 4Q88] shows fluidity of content). Using <strong>the</strong> criteria of order23 <strong>and</strong><br />

content, 24 statistics emerge that provide two bases for comparison<br />

between Psalms 1–89 <strong>and</strong> Psalms 90–150. 25 <strong>The</strong>se are <strong>the</strong> proportion of<br />

agreements <strong>and</strong> conflicts with <strong>the</strong> order of <strong>the</strong> MT (table 1), <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall<br />

number of times that specific psalms are joined to nonmasoretic compositions<br />

(table 2). When viewed toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>se results provide a firm<br />

basis for comparing <strong>the</strong> stability <strong>and</strong> fluidity of Psalms 1–89 <strong>and</strong> 90–150<br />

in relation to each o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

23. I.e., differing arrangements of adjoining psalms.<br />

24. I.e., <strong>the</strong> linkage with compositions present in or absent from <strong>the</strong> Masoretic Psalter.<br />

25. This methodology derives from Gerald H. Wilson’s pioneering investigation of<br />

<strong>the</strong> consecutive arrangement of Psalms in <strong>the</strong> scrolls, in “<strong>The</strong> Qumran Psalms<br />

Manuscripts <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Consecutive Arrangement of Psalms in <strong>the</strong> Hebrew Psalter,”<br />

CBQ 45 (1983): 377–88. Wilson’s work reinforced <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>sis that <strong>the</strong>se manuscripts<br />

attest to overall stability for Psalms 1–89, <strong>and</strong> to general fluidity for Psalm 90 onward.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!