16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

86 MESSIANIC EXPECTATION AT QUMRAN<br />

messiah in 4Q246, <strong>the</strong>n his role conforms well to that of <strong>the</strong> Davidic messiah<br />

in Psalms of Solomon 17: “He will judge <strong>the</strong> earth in truth <strong>and</strong> all will<br />

make peace. <strong>The</strong> sword will cease from <strong>the</strong> earth <strong>and</strong> all cities will pay<br />

him homage. <strong>The</strong> great God will be his strength. He will make war on<br />

his behalf, give nations into his h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> cast <strong>the</strong>m all down before<br />

him…” So while <strong>the</strong> language of this text is applied to Jesus in <strong>the</strong> Gospel<br />

of Luke, <strong>the</strong> concept of messiah in <strong>the</strong> Gospel is very different. <strong>The</strong><br />

Aramaic text confirms <strong>the</strong> picture that has already emerged of <strong>the</strong><br />

Davidic messiah as <strong>the</strong> warrior liberator of Israel. <strong>The</strong> title “Son of God”<br />

carries no implication of virgin birth or trinitarian (or binitarian) status<br />

in a Jewish context. 43<br />

A final question about <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong> Davidic messiah should be<br />

addressed. Maier has argued persuasively that in Jewish underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

<strong>the</strong> role or function is more important than <strong>the</strong> person of <strong>the</strong> messiah.<br />

This holds true for <strong>the</strong> Davidic messiah. We are told nothing whatever<br />

about his personality. (Presumably, he had not yet come.) It scarcely matters<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> mission is accomplished by a single messiah, or whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

a new dynasty is imagined. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> do not discuss what happens to<br />

<strong>the</strong> messiah after his mission is accomplished. Presumably, he establishes<br />

a kingdom of Israel on earth. A few passages in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> suggest that<br />

this is not <strong>the</strong> end. A hymn in <strong>the</strong> Hodayot anticipates a final conflagration,<br />

when “<strong>the</strong> torrents of Belial shall reach to all sides of <strong>the</strong><br />

world…<strong>and</strong> shall consume <strong>the</strong> foundations of <strong>the</strong> earth <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> expanse<br />

of dry l<strong>and</strong>” (1QH 11.29, 31). But in fact <strong>the</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> show little interest<br />

in describing what will eventually take place on earth, <strong>and</strong> pay greater<br />

attention to <strong>the</strong> fellowship that <strong>the</strong> elect enjoy with <strong>the</strong> angelic host. 44 It<br />

is enough that <strong>the</strong> wicked are defeated, <strong>and</strong> that individuals are rewarded<br />

or punished. It is not clear whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> messianic kingdom will last forever.<br />

<strong>The</strong> analogy of o<strong>the</strong>r apocalyptic writings, such as 4 Ezra <strong>and</strong><br />

Revelation, suggests that it will not. (In 4 Ezra 7 <strong>the</strong> messiah reigns for<br />

400 years <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n dies. Revelation anticipates a 1,000 year reign of<br />

Christ.) But this question is not clearly addressed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong>. It must<br />

4Q246 <strong>and</strong> 4Q521 <strong>and</strong> Qumran Messianism,” in <strong>The</strong> Provo International Conference on<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> (ed. D. W. Parry <strong>and</strong> E. Ulrich; STDJ 30; Leiden: Brill, 1999),<br />

545–65. <strong>The</strong> most developed argument for <strong>the</strong> negative view is provided by Edward<br />

M. Cook, “4Q246,” BBR 5 (1995): 43–66. See my rejoinder, “<strong>The</strong> Background of <strong>the</strong><br />

‘Son of God’ Text,” BBR 7 (1997): 1–12.<br />

43. While <strong>the</strong> expression “son of God” is sometimes used with reference to angelic<br />

beings (cf. Genesis 6), it is also applied collectively to <strong>the</strong> people of Israel (Exod<br />

4:22–23; Hos 11:1) <strong>and</strong> to <strong>the</strong> righteous man (Wis 2:13, 16).<br />

44. See fur<strong>the</strong>r John J. Collins, Apocalypticism in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> (London:<br />

Routledge, 1997), 110–29.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!