16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ELISHA QIMRON 197<br />

B. DUALISM AND THE DAY OF JUDGMENT<br />

Surely, God knows who is righteous <strong>and</strong> who is wicked; <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong> Day<br />

of Judgement, He will annihilate all <strong>the</strong> evildoers. He has, however, not<br />

revealed this secret to any human being. How could <strong>the</strong> community<br />

ensure that no evildoers be within it? As said above, all those who intentionally<br />

<strong>and</strong> openly transgressed were expelled <strong>and</strong> all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

remained within. Were <strong>the</strong>re no dubious cases? This simple question has<br />

never been asked. Prima facie evidence of dubious cases would surely contradict<br />

<strong>the</strong> assumed dualistic approach. Is it not more reasonable to<br />

assume that in human decision, <strong>the</strong>re may be cases of doubt? Two passages<br />

in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong> do indeed deal with doubtful cases. Both,<br />

however, were totally misinterpreted, because of <strong>the</strong> ignorance of <strong>the</strong><br />

practical aspect, <strong>the</strong> misreading of one of <strong>the</strong>se texts <strong>and</strong> as a result of<br />

<strong>the</strong> assumed dualism bias discussed above.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se texts deal with a group who entered <strong>the</strong> community, yet<br />

retained some of <strong>the</strong>ir old perverse ways with regard to <strong>the</strong> performance<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Torah comm<strong>and</strong>ments. Since <strong>the</strong>se men were nei<strong>the</strong>r purely righteous<br />

nor purely wicked, it was impossible to decide whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong>y<br />

should be expelled from <strong>the</strong> community <strong>and</strong> consigned to Belial.<br />

Benefiting from <strong>the</strong> doubt, it was determined that <strong>the</strong>y would remain in<br />

<strong>the</strong> community until Elijah arises on <strong>the</strong> Day of Judgment <strong>and</strong> decides in<br />

each case. <strong>The</strong>y were, however, not allowed to partake in <strong>the</strong> common<br />

property symbolizing <strong>the</strong> mutual responsibility <strong>and</strong> common fate. Let us<br />

discuss <strong>the</strong>se two passages. <strong>The</strong> first one is 1QS 9.5–11:<br />

#dwqh y#n) Nwhw[…]#dwq tyb dxyh y#n) wlydby )yhh t(b<br />

Mymtb Myklwhh<br />

wkzh )wl r#) hymrh y#n) Nwh M( Mnwh br(ty l) Krd<br />

lw(m ldbhl Mkrd<br />

tkll w)cy )wl hrwth tc( lwkmw Krd Mymtb tkllw<br />

Mbl twryr# lwkb<br />

d( Mb rsytl dxyh y#n) wlxh r#) Mynw#rh My+p#mb w+p#nw<br />

l)r#yw Nwrh) yxy#mw )ybn )wb<br />

<strong>The</strong> prevailing interpretation of this passage may be exemplified by <strong>the</strong><br />

translation of Geza Vermes:<br />

5:5–7, 13, Josh 7:1. Note also l(mb M)w drmb M) Josh 22:22. Also see Jehuda L.<br />

Palache, Semantic Notes on <strong>the</strong> Hebrew Lexicon (Leiden: Brill, 1959), 10–12, 45 (I am<br />

indebted to my friend Chaim Cohen for this reference).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!