16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116 A STUDY IN SHARED SYMBOLISM AND LANGUAGE<br />

created at Qumran (I am convinced that it originated with <strong>the</strong> Righteous<br />

Teacher). Note <strong>the</strong>se termini technici <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> resulting dualistic paradigm.<br />

Except for “Sons of Darkness,” all <strong>the</strong>se technical terms are found in a<br />

self-contained, short, memorable section of <strong>the</strong> Rule (e.g., cols. 3–4):<br />

light darkness<br />

Sons of Light [Sons of Darkness; see 1QS 1.10]<br />

Angel of Light Angel of Darkness<br />

Angel of Truth Spirit of Perversity<br />

Sons of Truth Sons of Perversity<br />

Sons of Righteousness Sons of Perversity<br />

spring of light well of darkness<br />

walking in <strong>the</strong> ways of light walking in <strong>the</strong> ways of darkness<br />

truth perversity<br />

God loves God hates<br />

everlasting life punishment, <strong>the</strong>n extinction<br />

All <strong>the</strong>se technical terms appear toge<strong>the</strong>r in one section of <strong>the</strong> Rule. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

are termini technici <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y form a paradigm.<br />

This paradigm explains <strong>the</strong> human condition by clarifying that God<br />

“created <strong>the</strong> spirits of light <strong>and</strong> darkness” (1QS 3.25), that “he founded<br />

every work upon <strong>the</strong>m” (3.25), <strong>and</strong> that all humans, including <strong>the</strong> “Sons<br />

of Light,” err because of <strong>the</strong> Angel of Darkness (3.22). 59 All <strong>the</strong>se terms<br />

(except for “Sons of Darkness”) are clustered in a focused passage to be<br />

taught to <strong>and</strong>, in my judgment, memorized by those who wish to cross<br />

over <strong>the</strong> barrier <strong>and</strong> into <strong>the</strong> Qumran Community. This section, Rule<br />

3.13–4.14, contains <strong>the</strong> quintessential dualistic teaching of <strong>the</strong><br />

Qumranites. “Sons of Light” is almost always unique to Qumran <strong>the</strong>ology<br />

<strong>and</strong> is <strong>the</strong> sect’s self-designation. 60 <strong>The</strong> term is defined in 1QS<br />

3.13–4.26 (3.13, 24, 25; cf. 1.9; 2.16; 3.3) <strong>and</strong> is found in many o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

59. Clearer in <strong>the</strong> Horoscopes than in <strong>the</strong> Rule is <strong>the</strong> explanation that each Son of<br />

Light has a mixture of darkness along with light (see esp. 4Q186). Each human has<br />

nine parts, some of light <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs of darkness. Some humans are very evil, having<br />

eight parts of darkness <strong>and</strong> one of light. O<strong>the</strong>r humans are nearly perfect, having<br />

eight parts of light <strong>and</strong> one of darkness.<br />

60. <strong>The</strong> technical term “Sons of Light” has been found only in Qumran compositions<br />

<strong>and</strong> in documents influenced by Qumran <strong>the</strong>ology. See David Flusser, Judaism<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Origins of Christianity (Jerusalem: Magnes, 1988), esp. 26; idem, “<strong>The</strong> Parable<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Unjust Steward: Jesus’ Criticism of <strong>the</strong> Essenes,” in Jesus <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong><br />

(ed. J. H. Charlesworth; ABRL; New York: Doubleday, 1992), 176–97. Bauckham,<br />

“<strong>The</strong> Qumran Community <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel of John,” claims that I “misrepresent <strong>the</strong><br />

matter” when I claim that “<strong>the</strong> expression ‘sons of light’ is characteristic of Qumran<br />

<strong>and</strong> John” (109). He quotes me correctly, <strong>and</strong> from John <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Dead</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Scrolls</strong>, 101.<br />

Bauckham claims that “sons of light” appears in Luke 16:8; 1 <strong>The</strong>ss 5:5; <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!