16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

156 A NEW EDITION OF THE HEBREW BIBLE<br />

this passage, in which <strong>the</strong> Most High (apparently a title of Yahweh)<br />

divides <strong>the</strong> nations <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n chooses Israel to be his own portion, seems<br />

linked with <strong>the</strong> old notion that each nation has its own tutelary god (in<br />

later tradition, guardian angel). <strong>The</strong> statement in this passage—“He<br />

divided <strong>the</strong> sons of Man / He established <strong>the</strong> boundaries of <strong>the</strong> peoples /<br />

according to <strong>the</strong> number of <strong>the</strong> sons of God” (i.e., <strong>the</strong> divine beings) 15 —<br />

makes sense in this context, while <strong>the</strong> alternative reading, “sons of Israel,”<br />

makes no sense in context. <strong>The</strong> latter reading is easily understood as a<br />

<strong>the</strong>ological revision made at a time when <strong>the</strong> idea of <strong>the</strong> existence of gods<br />

of o<strong>the</strong>r nations was unacceptable. A simple change from “God” to<br />

“Israel” solved this problem for a pious scribe. A contributing factor may<br />

have been <strong>the</strong> tradition that <strong>the</strong> “number of <strong>the</strong> sons of Israel” who went<br />

down to Egypt was seventy (see Exod 1:1, 5), since this corresponds to<br />

<strong>the</strong> number of nations in some ancient traditions. It is difficult to see how<br />

“Israel” could have been <strong>the</strong> original reading in Deut 32:8, however, <strong>and</strong><br />

it is more difficult to conceive of a motive for a later scribe to change<br />

“Israel” to “God,” <strong>the</strong>reby creating <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ological problem. As scholars<br />

have concluded with near unanimity, <strong>the</strong> reading of 4QDeut j [= 4Q37]<br />

<strong>and</strong> LXX is to be preferred in this passage. 16<br />

An important support for this position is found in Deut 4:19–20. This<br />

passage refers to <strong>the</strong> “host of heaven” which Yahweh “distributed” (ha4laq)<br />

among <strong>the</strong> “peoples” ((ammîm), whereas Yahweh chose Israel to be his<br />

own “portion” (nah[a6 lâ). <strong>The</strong> resemblance of <strong>the</strong>se words <strong>and</strong> ideas to<br />

Deut 32:8–9 is striking. Because of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r similarities, scholars<br />

have argued that Deut 4:19–20 (<strong>and</strong> ch. 4 generally) is dependent on <strong>the</strong><br />

older poem of Deuteronomy 32. In light of this probable relationship, it<br />

appears that Deut 4:19–20 is dependent on a version of Deut 32:8 that<br />

read “sons of God” (with 4QDeut j <strong>and</strong> LXX). 17 This inner-biblical evidence<br />

supports <strong>the</strong> text-critical judgment that “sons of God” is <strong>the</strong> original<br />

reading in Deut 32:8.<br />

edition by Julie Ann Duncan, “4QDeut j ,” in Qumran Cave 4.IX: Deuteronomy, Joshua,<br />

Judges, Kings (ed. E. Ulrich et al.; DJD 14; Oxford: Clarendon, 1995), 75–92.<br />

15. See Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7; Ps 29:1; 89:7; Gen 6:1–4; <strong>and</strong> Hendel, “Sons of God.”<br />

16. See references in Lana, “Angelologia.” Most modern translations have also<br />

incorporated this reading.<br />

17. See Patrick W. Skehan, “<strong>The</strong> Structure of <strong>the</strong> Song of Moses in Deuteronomy<br />

(32:1–43),” CBQ 13 (1951): 157–59; Jon D. Levenson, “Who Inserted <strong>the</strong> Book of <strong>the</strong><br />

Torah?” HTR 68 (1975): 215, 221n38; <strong>and</strong> recently, Jeffrey H. Tigay, Deuteronomy<br />

(JPS Torah Commentary; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1996), 514–15.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!