16.06.2013 Views

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls: The ... - josephprestonkirk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172 THE COMMUNITY OF LAY READERS<br />

page headings—all <strong>the</strong>se are not considered to be canonized, since most<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se elements did not exist in <strong>the</strong> earliest extant biblical manuscripts.<br />

Such elements are post-canonization-period inventions that serve as useful<br />

resources <strong>and</strong> tools to assist <strong>the</strong> reader in accessing <strong>the</strong> biblical text.<br />

4QSAM a VERSUS MASORETIC SAMUEL<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> last two centuries a number of textual critics have recognized<br />

that <strong>the</strong> MT of 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 Samuel has experienced transmissional corruption.<br />

16 Various introductions to works on Samuel have summarized problems<br />

with <strong>the</strong> MT of Samuel, followed by seriatim treatments of variant<br />

readings in <strong>the</strong> ancient witnesses. As early as 1842, Otto <strong>The</strong>nius 17 systematically<br />

identified corruptions in <strong>the</strong> Samuel MT <strong>and</strong> argued for<br />

restorations <strong>and</strong> emendations based on <strong>the</strong> LXX. His groundbreaking<br />

work was accepted <strong>and</strong> used by Heinrich Ewald, 18 followed by Friedrich<br />

Böttcher; 19 but later scholars believed that <strong>The</strong>nius lacked discrimination<br />

in his use of <strong>the</strong> LXX. In 1871, Julius Wellhausen, 20 with a proper critical<br />

eye <strong>and</strong> perhaps a well-developed sixth sense, created a work that<br />

sought to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> articulate <strong>the</strong> underlying rules <strong>and</strong> principles<br />

that may have governed <strong>the</strong> LXX translators; he also succeeded in comprehending,<br />

to a point, <strong>the</strong> challenges connected to <strong>the</strong> textual critic’s<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>the</strong> transmission of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bible</strong>. At <strong>the</strong> close of <strong>the</strong> nineteenth<br />

century, Samuel R. Driver, author of <strong>the</strong> first serious English work<br />

on <strong>the</strong> books of Samuel, 21 asserted that <strong>the</strong> Samuel books “have suffered<br />

unusually from transcriptional corruption.” 22 Present scholars have also<br />

observed weaknesses in <strong>the</strong> MT of Samuel, using descriptions such as<br />

16. This statement pertains only to Samuel, not to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r books of <strong>the</strong> Hebrew<br />

<strong>Bible</strong>.<br />

17. Otto <strong>The</strong>nius, Die Bücher Samuels, erklärt (Leipzig: Weidmann, 1842; 2d ed.,<br />

Leipzig: Hirzel, 1864).<br />

18. Heinrich Ewald, Geschichte des Volkes Israel bis Christus (7 vols.; Göttingen: Dieterich,<br />

1843–69); ET: <strong>The</strong> History of Israel (8 vols.; London: Longmans, Green, 1867–).<br />

19. Friedrich Böttcher, Neue exegetisch-kritische Ährenlese zum Alten Testamente (Leipzig:<br />

Barth, 1863).<br />

20. Julius Wellhausen, Der Text der Bücher Samuelis (Göttingen: V<strong>and</strong>enhoeck &<br />

Ruprecht, 1871).<br />

21. Samuel R. Driver, Notes on <strong>the</strong> Hebrew Text <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Topography of <strong>the</strong> Books of Samuel<br />

(Oxford: Clarendon, 1890).<br />

22. Ibid., i.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!